Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012;17(3):446-54.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0397. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Prospective comparison of prognostic scores in palliative care cancer populations

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prospective comparison of prognostic scores in palliative care cancer populations

Marco Maltoni et al. Oncologist. 2012.

Abstract

Purpose: Predicting prognosis in advanced cancer aids physicians in clinical decision making and can help patients and their families to prepare for the time ahead.

Materials and methods: This multicenter, observational, prospective, nonrandomized population-based study evaluated life span prediction of four prognostic scores used in palliative care: the original palliative prognostic score (PaP Score), a variant of PaP Score including delirium (D-PaP Score), the Palliative Performance Scale, and the Palliative Prognostic Index.

Results: A total of 549 patients were enrolled onto the study. Median survival of the entire group was 22 days (95% confidence intervals [95% CI] = 19-24). All four prognostic models discriminated well between groups of patients with different survival probabilities. Log-rank tests were all highly significant (p < .0001). The PaP and D-PaP scores were the most accurate, with a C index of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.70-0.73) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.71-0.74), respectively.

Conclusion: It can be confirmed that all four prognostic scores used in palliative care studies accurately identify classes of patients with different survival probabilities. The PaP Score has been extensively validated and shows high accuracy and reproducibility in different settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meyer overall survival curve for the entire population. Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall survival curves for the low (group A), intermediate (group B), and high (group C) risk groups defined by (A) Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP Score), (B) Delirium-Palliative Prognostic Score (D-PaP Score), (C) Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), and (D) Palliative Performance Scale (PPS). All four models discriminated well, and log-rank tests were all highly significant (p < .0001). Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.

References

    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health; Pub Med Gov. [accessed September 20, 2011]. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
    1. Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM, et al. Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3860–3866. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finlay E, Casarett D. Making difficult discussions easier: using prognosis to facilitate transitions to hospice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:250–263. - PubMed
    1. Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S, et al. Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2319–2326. - PubMed
    1. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:733–742. - PubMed

Publication types