Liposuction infiltration: The Quito formula - a new approach based on an old concept
- PMID: 22379369
- PMCID: PMC3086502
- DOI: 10.1177/229255031101900105
Liposuction infiltration: The Quito formula - a new approach based on an old concept
Abstract
Introduction: Liposuction is a highly sought after surgical procedure. Despite its popularity, not all of the factors associated with its execution are well understood. No well-established guidelines exist for plastic surgeons regarding the subcutaneous infiltration of fluid and, thus, the procedure is often performed subjectively.
Objective: To establish the usefulness of the Quito formula (infiltrate volume = weight [kg] × percentage of body surface to be liposuctioned × 2.4 [mL]) for calculating the volume of fluid to be infiltrated subcutaneously during small-volume liposuction performed under epidural anesthesia.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on a group of 50 patients who were candidates for liposuction on multiple body parts between November 2004 and February 2010.
Results: The maximum volume of infiltrate was 5000 mL and the maximum volume of aspirate was 4500 mL, with a 30% total aspirated area. No patient required blood transfusion, and there were no major complications. However, one patient presented with a small local infection, another with a sacral seroma and two patients had postdural puncture headaches. No patient showed clinical signs consistent with overhydration, dehydration, pulmonary embolism, fat embolism or lidocaine intoxication.
Conclusions: When performing small-volume liposuction, subcutaneous infiltration using the Quito formula to calculate the volume of infiltrate proved to be useful, safe and objective.
INTRODUCTION :: La liposuccion est une intervention chirurgicale très recherchée. Malgré sa popularité, les facteurs associés à son exposition ne sont pas tous bien compris. Il n’existe aucune directive bien établie à l’intention des plasticiens au sujet des infiltrations sous-cutanées de liquide et, par conséquent, l’intervention est souvent exécutée de manière subjective.
OBJECTIF :: Établir l’utilité de la formule Quito (volume d’infiltrat = poids [kg] × pourcentage de surface corporelle devant faire l’objet de la liposuccion × 2,4 [mL]) pour calculer le volume de liquide à infiltrer par voie sous-cutanée pendant une liposuccion à faible volume exécutée sous anesthésie péridurale.
MÉTHODOLOGIE :: Les chercheurs ont mené une étude prospective auprès d’un groupe de 50 patients candidats à la liposuccion sur de multiples parties du corps entre novembre 2004 et février 2010.
RÉSULTATS :: Le volume maximal d’infiltrat était de 5 000 mL, et le volume maximal d’aspirat, de 4 500 mL, pour une région aspirée totale de 30 %. Aucun patient n’a dû recevoir de transfusion sanguine, et on n’a constaté aucunes complications majeures. Cependant, un patient a souffert d’une petite infection localisée, un autre, d’un sérome de la région sacrée et deux, de céphalées post-ponction durale. Aucun patient n’a démontré de signes cliniques évocateurs de surhydratation, de déshydratation, d’embolie pulmonaire, d’embolie graisseuse ou d’intoxication à la lidocaïne.
CONCLUSIONS :: Pour effectuer une liposuccion à faible volume, l’infiltration sous-cutanée faisant appel à la formule Quito afin de calculer le volume d’infiltrat s’est révélée utile, sécuritaire et objective.
Keywords: Infiltration; Liposuction; Quito formula; Small volume.
Similar articles
-
Safety considerations and fluid resuscitation in liposuction: an analysis of 53 consecutive patients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Nov;102(6):2220-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00063. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998. PMID: 9811024
-
Safe total corporal contouring with large-volume liposuction for the obese patient.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;30(5):574-88. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0050-7. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006. PMID: 16977358
-
Safe extensive tumescent liposuction with segmental infiltration of lower concentration lidocaine under monitored anesthesia care.Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jan;74(1):6-11. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182933de7. Ann Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 24051464 Clinical Trial.
-
Lipoplasty in the Overweight Patient.Clin Plast Surg. 2024 Jan;51(1):29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Clin Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 37945074 Review.
-
Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction.J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990 Mar;16(3):248-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1990.tb03961.x. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990. PMID: 2179348 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of factors affecting the postoperative drainage in patients with abdominoplasty with circumferential liposuction.Front Surg. 2025 Apr 25;12:1581931. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1581931. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40352306 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fodor PB. Lipoplasty: A personal, conceptual, and historical perspective. Aesth Plast Surg. 2007;31:313–6. - PubMed
-
- Toledo L. Panel discussion. Issues in abdominoplasty. Aesth Surg J. 2000;20:403–9.
-
- Commons GW, Halperin B, Chang CC. Large-volume liposuction; a review of 631 consecutive cases over 12 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1753–63. - PubMed
-
- Rohrich RJ. Fluid resuscitation in liposuction: A retrospective review of 89 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:431–5. - PubMed
-
- Basile A, Fernandes F, Volpe V, Basile F. Fluid resuscitation in liposuction: A prospective analysis of infiltrate-to-total aspirate ratios lower than used for the superwet technique. Aesth Plast Surg. 2006;30:659–65. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources