Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;7(6):361-6.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000364.

Documentation and discussion of preferences for care among patients with advanced cancer

Affiliations

Documentation and discussion of preferences for care among patients with advanced cancer

Sangeeta C Ahluwalia et al. J Oncol Pract. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to describe the documentation, frequency, and timing of discussions about patient preferences for care and to examine patterns of palliative care and hospice use among patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: We prospectively abstracted the medical records of 118 patients receiving care at a Veterans Administration (VA) facility from diagnosis of stage IV disease to 12 months postdiagnosis or death. We used univariate statistics to describe the type and frequency of documentation of patient preferences and palliative care/hospice referral. We calculated the time from diagnosis to the first documentation of preferences and the time from first documentation to death. We compared documentation of patient preferences between decedents and nondecedents using χ(2) tests.

Results: The majority of patients (81%) had some documentation of their care preferences recorded, although decedents were significantly more likely to have had their preferences documented than nondecedents (96% v 60%; P < .000). Most (53%) patients did not have a formal advance directive documented in the medical record. The mean time from diagnosis to the first documentation of preferences was approximately 2 months. More than half of all patients (53%) and almost three-quarters of decedents (73%) had a palliative care consultation.

Conclusion: Despite high rates of preference documentation, there remains room for improvement. Providers may need to be helped to identify patients earlier in their trajectory for appropriate palliative care services, and future work should focus on developing useful alternatives to advance directives for adequately documenting patient preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tierney WM, Dexter PR, Gramelspacher GP, et al. The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:32–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley EH, Hallemeier AG, Fried TR, et al. Documentation of discussions about prognosis with terminally ill patients. Am J Med. 2001;111:218–223. - PubMed
    1. Sharma RK, Dy SM. Documentation of information and care planning for patients with advanced cancer: Associations with patient characteristics and utilization of hospital care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. [epub ahead of print on March 30, 2011] - PubMed
    1. Kish SK, Martin CG, Price KJ. Advance directives in critically ill cancer patients. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2000;12:373–383. - PubMed
    1. Wenger NS, Phillips RS, Teno JM, et al. Physician understanding of patient resuscitation preferences: Insights and clinical implications. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S44–S51. - PubMed