Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery
- PMID: 22381552
- DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2011.04.027
Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery
Abstract
Breaches in the glove barrier pose a risk for transmission of bloodborne pathogens during surgical procedures. Double gloving or double gloving with an indicator glove system may provide added protection. For this 24-month study, we used a comparative design to examine the effect of double gloving with inner indicator gloves on the durability of inner gloves and the detection of glove tears or perforations during surgery. The frequency of seeing blood on the hand after surgery was greater with single gloving than with double gloving, and the frequency of changing gloves during surgery was significantly higher among those who double gloved with an indicator glove system versus double gloving alone. The majority of health care providers in our study expressed favorable views about double gloving.
Copyright © 2012 AORN, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.017. Epub 2012 Feb 17. Am J Surg. 2012. PMID: 22342011 Clinical Trial.
-
Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery.Eur J Surg. 1997 Mar;163(3):163-7. Eur J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9085056 Clinical Trial.
-
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458. Postgrad Med J. 2001. PMID: 11423598 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Use of double gloving to reduce surgical personnel's risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens: an integrative review.AORN J. 2013 Dec;98(6):585-596.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.10.004. AORN J. 2013. PMID: 24266931 Review.
-
[Defects in the surgical glove barrier. Single or double gloves].Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Mar 3;165(10):1016-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 2003. PMID: 12645406 Review. Danish.
Cited by
-
Gender differences in practicing standard precautions against blood-borne pathogens among surgeons at a tertiary care center: A cross-sectional study.Avicenna J Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):15-22. doi: 10.4103/ajm.AJM_146_18. Avicenna J Med. 2019. PMID: 30697521 Free PMC article.
-
Double gloving for self-protection in high-risk surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 8;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02760-z. Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40057774 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective study on the risk of glove fingertip contamination during draping in joint replacement surgery.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Sep;96(6):434-6. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184902046. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014. PMID: 25198974 Free PMC article.
-
Escherichia coli Necrotizing Fasciitis After Abdominoplasty Combined With Liposuction: A Report of a Case and Review of the Literature.Cureus. 2025 Jun 18;17(6):e86261. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86261. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40688944 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of surgeons' adherence to preventive intraoperative measures of surgical site infection in Gaza Strip hospitals: a multi-centre cross-sectional study.BMC Surg. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-0684-4. BMC Surg. 2020. PMID: 32000748 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources