Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 May;54(1):42-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.01.022. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Rapid HIV screening: missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis and prevention

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Rapid HIV screening: missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis and prevention

Pragna Patel et al. J Clin Virol. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Although rapid HIV tests increase the number of persons who are aware of their HIV status, they may fail to detect early HIV infection.

Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity for early HIV infection of several rapid tests and third- and fourth-generation assays compared with nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT).

Study design: Sensitivity for early HIV infection was evaluated using 62 NAAT-positive/WB-negative or indeterminate specimens from the CDC Acute HIV Infection study. Specimens underwent third-generation testing with Genetic Systems 1/2+O(®) and rapid testing with Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2. A subset was also tested with four FDA-approved rapid tests and Determine HIV-1 Antigen/Antibody Rapid Test(®) and Architect HIV Antigen/Antibody Combo(®), both fourth-generation tests.

Results: Of 99,111 specimens screened from April 2006 to March 2008, 62 met the definition for early HIV infection (60 NAAT-positive/seronegative and 2 NAAT-positive/Western blot indeterminate). Third-generation testing correctly detected antibody in 34 specimens (55%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 42-67); Multispot detected antibody in 16 (26%; 95% CI: 16-38). Of the 62 specimens, 33 (53%) had sufficient quantity for further testing. Rapid test sensitivities for early HIV infection ranged from 22-33% compared with 55-57% for the third-generation assay and 76-88% for the fourth-generation tests.

Conclusions: Many rapid HIV tests failed to detect half of the early HIV infection cases in whom antibody was present. Programs that screen high-incidence populations with rapid tests should consider supplemental testing with NAAT or other antigen-based tests. These data support the need for more sensitive antigen-based point-of-care screening tests for early HIV infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Window of detection of HIV markers early in HIV infection and window period of different generations of immunoassays (IAs) compared to nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for HIV RNA and Western blot positivity. AHI, acute HIV infection; IA, immunoassay; Ab, antibody; Ag, antigen; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test. Eclipse period: time after HIV acquisition when HIV RNA may be present in very small quantities but is undetectable. Acute HIV infection: phase of early HIV infection when HIV RNA and p24 antigen are detectable but HIV antibodies are not. Early HIV infection: stage of infection prior to HIV seroconversion or Western blot positivity. Fourth-generation assay: detects p24 antigen and IgM/IgG HIV antibodies; third-generation assay detects IgM/IgG HIV antibodies; second-generation and first-generation assays detect IgG HIV antibodies. *Adapted from Fiebig et al. Dynamics of HIV viremia and antibody seroconversion in plasma donors: implications for diagnosis and staging of primary HIV infection. AIDS 2003, 17:1871–79 and slide courtesy of S. Kleinman (written permission obtained 03/08/2009).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Specimen testing algorithm for early HIV infection.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Advancing HIV prevention: new strategies for a changing epidemic – United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:329–32. - PubMed
    1. Campsmith ML, Rhodes PH, Hall HI, Green TA. Undiagnosed HIV prevalence among adults and adolescents in the United States at the end of 2006. J Acq Immune Def Synd. 2010;53:619–24. - PubMed
    1. Branson BM. State of the art for diagnosis of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:S221–5. - PubMed
    1. Owen SM, Yang C, Spira T, Ou CY, Pau CP, Parekh BS, et al. Alternate algorithms for human immunodeficiency virus infection diagnosis using tests that are licensed in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1494–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louie B, Wong E, Klausner JD, et al. Assessment of rapid tests for detection of human immunodeficiency virus-specific antibodies in recently infected individuals. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1588–95. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances