[Measuring the subjective visual vertical using a portable system: a comparison with the standard darkroom method]
- PMID: 22382375
- DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2419-4
[Measuring the subjective visual vertical using a portable system: a comparison with the standard darkroom method]
Abstract
Objective: Assessing otolithic functions in the case of vertigo, although significant, is challenging from a practical point of view. A tilt of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a very sensitive sign of vestibular tonus imbalance in the roll plane. The standard method, a light bar in the dark, requires expensive, stationary equipment. However, portable equipment has been developed. The patient, who is in complete darkness afforded by a cover, sits in front of a monitor that can be seen by him and the examiner. Results obtained with this system were validated and compared with the standard application.
Patients and methods: Measurements were taken in 100 unselected, consecutive patients suffering from dizziness treated at the Baumrain Klinik, Bad Berleburg as well as in 26 healthy volunteers. All were examined and diagnosed by an ENT physician. Measurements in all participants were taken first with the standard procedure (equipment Vertitest) followed by the portable procedure (Vertistar equipment). In each case the deviation of the absolute from the true vertical was measured and the mean differences between the two procedures calculated. These were then analyzed using a paired t-test with the help of the SPSS system.
Results: Comparative measurements in the dizziness group (n = 100), t(25) = 0.868, p = 0.394 and in the healthy control group (n = 26), t(99) = -0.192, p = 0.848 showed no significant differences in the distribution of SVV values while using the stationary or the portable version. Inter-test reliability was significantly positive (r = 0.852; p < 0.01, n = 126).
Conclusions: The portable method for measuring SVV is practical, flexible and cost-effective and demonstrates the same diagnostic accuracy as the stationary method.
Similar articles
-
[Diagnosis of otolith function and estimation of subjective visual vertical].HNO. 2012 Apr;60(4):327-9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-012-2502-5. HNO. 2012. PMID: 22491881 German. No abstract available.
-
Clinical use of subjective visual horizontal and vertical in patients of unilateral vestibular neuritis.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jun;28(4):520-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000271674.41307.f2. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17529853
-
Subjective visual vertical testing in children and adolescents.Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):727-31. doi: 10.1002/lary.25389. Epub 2015 May 25. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26014221
-
[Examination of visual performance by adaptive optics].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013 Dec;230(12):1199-206. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351070. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013. PMID: 24327282 Review. German.
-
The interaction of otolith and proprioceptive information in the perception of verticality. The effects of labyrinthine and CNS disease.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 May 28;871:324-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09195.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999. PMID: 10372082 Review.
Cited by
-
The Value of Subjective Visual Vertical in Diagnosis of Vestibular Migraine.Curr Med Sci. 2021 Aug;41(4):654-660. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2418-y. Epub 2021 Aug 17. Curr Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34403088
-
[Utricular function. Correlation of three investigations carried out in routine practice].HNO. 2013 Aug;61(8):692-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2715-2. HNO. 2013. PMID: 23744088 German.
-
Evaluation of subjective visual vertical and horizontal in patients with acoustic neuroma based on virtual reality.Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 26;17:1264585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1264585. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37954872 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous