Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;36(5):1083-1088.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1510-7.

Management of esophageal foreign bodies: experience in a developing country

Affiliations

Management of esophageal foreign bodies: experience in a developing country

Foster Tochukwu Orji et al. World J Surg. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: The outcome of esophagoscopy for removal of suspected esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) is dependent on the FB characteristics and the surgeon's experience. This study was conducted to review our experience and highlight challenges in the management of EFBs in a developing country. The value of radiologic signs in FB detection was also evaluated.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 131 patients: 58.8% males and 41.9% females aged 8 months to 64 years, treated for suspected EFBs in our institution over a 13-year period. Statistics were derived by univariate analysis

Results: Foreign bodies were found and retrieved in 118 cases. Coins were the predominant FB in children (35%), and bones (25%) and dentures (17%) were predominant in adults. Plain radiography was highly useful in detecting FBs in children (coins/metals 100%) but less so in adults (bones 25%, dentures 11%). Repeated esophagoscopy attempts were encountered more in patients with impacted sharp objects (85%) and were recorded significantly among trainee surgeons (p = 0.004). Open esophagotomy was carried out in 13 (10%) difficult cases. Major complications including two iatrogenic esophageal perforations and one death occurred following esophagoscopy by trainee surgeons.

Conclusions: Rigid esophagoscopy is relatively safe and useful procedure in trained hands for removal of EFBs. Management of long-standing EFBs, dentures, and other sharp objects requires the skills of the most experienced members of the surgical team for a successful outcome. Open surgical treatment is unavoidable in cases of irretrievable esophageal FBs or in the presence of esophageal perforation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cheng W, Tam PK (1999) Foreign body ingestion in children: experience with 1,265 cases. J Pediatr Surg 34:1472–1476 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Mahafza T, Betieha A, Suboh M et al (2002) Esophageal foreign bodies: a Jordanian experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 64:225–227 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Little DC, Shah SR, St. Peter SD et al (2006) Esophageal foreign bodies in the pediatric population: our first 500 cases. J Pediatr Surg 41:914–918 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Waltzman ML, Baskin M, Wypij D et al (2005) A randomized clinical trial of the management of esophageal coins in children. Pediatrics 116:614–619 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Athanassiadi K, Gerazounis M, Metaxas E et al (2002) Management of esophageal foreign bodies: a retrospective review of 400 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:653–656 - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms