Regarding the confusion between the population concept and Mayr's "population thinking"
- PMID: 22384747
- DOI: 10.1086/662455
Regarding the confusion between the population concept and Mayr's "population thinking"
Abstract
Ernst Mayr said that one of Darwin's greatest contributions was to show scholars the way to population thinking, and to help them discard a mindset of typological thinking. Population thinking rejects a focus on a central representative type, and emphasizes the variation among individuals. However, Mayr's choice of terms has led to confusion, particularly among biologists who study natural populations. Both population thinking and the concept of a biological population were inspired by Darwin, and from Darwin the chain for both concepts runs through Francis Galton who introduced the statistical usage of "population" that appears in Mayr's population thinking. It was Galton's "population" that was modified by geneticists and biometricians in the early 20th century to refer to an interbreeding and evolving community of organisms. Under this meaning, a population is a biological entity and so paradoxically population thinking, which emphasizes variation at the expense of dwelling on entities, is usually not about populations. Mayr did not address the potential for misunderstanding but for him the important part of the population concept was that the organisms within a population were variable, and so he probably thought there should not be confusion between population thinking and the concept of a population.
Similar articles
-
Finding Ernst Mayr's Plato.Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2013 Dec;44(4 Pt B):714-23. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 14. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2013. PMID: 24135002
-
Commemorating the 20th century Darwin: Ernst Mayr's words and thoughts, five years later. Interview by Rob J. Kulathinal.Genome. 2010 Feb;53(2):157-9. doi: 10.1139/g09-094. Genome. 2010. PMID: 20140034
-
"A temporary oversimplification": Mayr, Simpson, Dobzhansky, and the origins of the typology/population dichotomy (part 2 of 2).Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016 Jun;57:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 21. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016. PMID: 26471926
-
Evolution in small steps and giant leaps.Evolution. 2022 Feb;76(S1):67-77. doi: 10.1111/evo.14432. Epub 2022 Jan 29. Evolution. 2022. PMID: 35040122 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Speciation, natural selection, and networks: three historians versus theoretical population geneticists.Theory Biosci. 2024 Feb;143(1):1-26. doi: 10.1007/s12064-024-00412-9. Epub 2024 Jan 29. Theory Biosci. 2024. PMID: 38282046 Review.
Cited by
-
Who and what is a "population"? Historical debates, current controversies, and implications for understanding "population health" and rectifying health inequities.Milbank Q. 2012 Dec;90(4):634-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00678.x. Milbank Q. 2012. PMID: 23216426 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The pace of modern culture.Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Apr;4(4):352-360. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0802-4. Epub 2020 Jan 20. Nat Hum Behav. 2020. PMID: 31959923
-
The History of the Panmictic Population Concept and Its Legacy in Contemporary Population Genetics.Ann Hum Genet. 2025 Sep;89(5):274-284. doi: 10.1111/ahg.70015. Epub 2025 Jul 28. Ann Hum Genet. 2025. PMID: 40719227 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal migration rates affect the genetic structure of populations in the biennial Erysimum mediohispanicum with reproductive asynchrony.AoB Plants. 2020 Jul 25;12(4):plaa037. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa037. eCollection 2020 Aug. AoB Plants. 2020. PMID: 32904355 Free PMC article.
-
Population Thinking and the Uniqueness of Biological Entities.Acta Biotheor. 2025 Jun 13;73(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s10441-025-09498-0. Acta Biotheor. 2025. PMID: 40512390 Free PMC article.