Recovery in England: transforming statutory services?
- PMID: 22385424
- DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2011.645025
Recovery in England: transforming statutory services?
Abstract
English mental health policy has explicitly supported a focus on recovery since 2001. More recently, this has been elaborated through policy support for social inclusion, employment and well-being. We review several drivers for this political orientation, including a refocusing of the role of health services as a whole from treating illnesses to helping people to make the most of their lives, the shift to greater power for the individual, reflected in personal social care and personal health budgets, and the evidence informing clinical guidelines issued by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). A disjunction remains between policy and practice, with organizational policies espousing a recovery orientation and teams re-branding as 'recovery and support' teams, whilst pursuing clinical practices which prioritize symptomatic treatment rather than recovery support. The next phase of development in English statutory mental health services is therefore bridging this gap, through organizational transformation in mental health services towards a focus on recovery. We describe two funded initiatives to support this process of organizational transformation. The first (ImROC) is a national initiative to develop a pro-recovery organizational climate. The second (REFOCUS) is a multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN02507940) investigating a team-level pro-recovery intervention.
Similar articles
-
Leading a horse to water: an action perspective on mental health policy.J Clin Psychol. 2006 Sep;62(9):1141-55. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20294. J Clin Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16810670
-
Recovery in Israel: a legislative recovery response to the needs-rights paradox.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;24(1):48-55. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.652600. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 22385426
-
Measuring recovery in mental health services.Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2010;47(3):206-12. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2010. PMID: 21149985 Review.
-
Evaluating mental health care and policy in Spain.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):73-86. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010. PMID: 20919594 Review.
-
United Kingdom (England): Health system review.Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(1):1-483, xix-xx. Health Syst Transit. 2011. PMID: 21454148
Cited by
-
Focusing a realist evaluation of peer support for paediatric mental health.Discov Ment Health. 2023 Oct 5;3(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s44192-023-00045-2. Discov Ment Health. 2023. PMID: 37861950 Free PMC article.
-
Combining online and offline peer support groups in community mental health care settings: a qualitative study of service users' experiences.Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 May 29;14:39. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00370-x. eCollection 2020. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020. PMID: 32514303 Free PMC article.
-
Social sustainability and mental health: a threat to evidence-based practice?BJPsych Int. 2016 Feb 1;13(1):4-5. doi: 10.1192/s2056474000000866. eCollection 2016 Feb. BJPsych Int. 2016. PMID: 29093880 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36367232 Free PMC article.
-
Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems.World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):12-20. doi: 10.1002/wps.20084. World Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 24497237 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous