Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 May;12(4):356-71.
doi: 10.2174/156800912800190901.

DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment

Affiliations
Review

DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment

S Solier et al. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2012 May.

Abstract

Although several drugs have been designed in the last few years to target specific key pathways and functions in colorectal cancer (CRC), the backbone of CRC treatment is still made up of compounds which rely on DNA damage to accomplish their role. DNA damage response (DDR) and checkpoint pathways are intertwined signaling networks that arrest cell cycle, recognize and repair genetic mistakes which arise during DNA replication and transcription, as well as through the exposure to chemical and physical agents that interact with nucleic acids. The good but highly variable activity of DNA damaging agents in the treatment of CRC suggests that intrinsic alterations in DDR pathways and cell cycle checkpoints may contribute differentially to the way cancer cells react to DNA damage. In the present review, our aim is to depict the recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of the activity of DNA damaging agents used for the treatment of CRC. We focus on the known and potential drug targets that are part of these complex and intertwined pathways. We describe the potential role of the checkpoints in CRC, and how their pharmacological manipulation could lead to chemopotentiation or synergism with currently used drugs. Novel therapeutic agents playing a role in DDR and checkpoint inhibition are assessed. We discuss the possible rationale for combining PARP inhibition with DNA damaging agents, and we address the link between DDR and EGFR pathways in CRC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Figures

Fig. (1).
Fig. (1).
Oxaliplatin pathways: thin dotted arrows indicate pathways that are not deemed relevant in oxaliplatin DDR compared with cisplatin (this diagram has been reproduced with modifications from http://www.pharmgkb.org. Permission has been given by PharmGKB and Stanford University; copyright PharmGKB).
Fig. (2).
Fig. (2).
Cell cycle checkpoints.
Fig. (3).
Fig. (3).
EGFR pathways.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joyce GF The antiquity of RNA-based evolution. Nature 2002, 418 (6894), 214–221. - PubMed
    1. Shechner DM; Grant RA; Bagby SC; Koldobskaya Y; Piccirilli JA; Bartel DP Crystal structure of the catalytic core of an RNA-polymerase ribozyme. Science 2009, 326 (5957), 12711275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson SP; Bartek J The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009, 461 (7267), 1071–1078. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kastan MB; Bartek J Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 2004, 432 (7015), 316–323. - PubMed
    1. Stracker TH; Usui T; Petrini JH Taking the time to make important decisions: the checkpoint effector kinases Chk1 and Chk2 and the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst). 2009, 8 (9), 1047–1054. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types