Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Mar 2:11:18.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-18.

A retrospective analysis of amputation rates in diabetic patients: can lower extremity amputations be further prevented?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A retrospective analysis of amputation rates in diabetic patients: can lower extremity amputations be further prevented?

Alexandra Alvarsson et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: Lower extremity amputations are costly and debilitating complications in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Our aim was to investigate changes in the amputation rate in patients with DM at the Karolinska University Hospital in Solna (KS) following the introduction of consensus guidelines for treatment and prevention of diabetic foot complications, and to identify risk groups of lower extremity amputations that should be targeted for preventive treatment.

Methods: 150 diabetic and 191 nondiabetic patients were amputated at KS between 2000 and 2006; of these 102 diabetic and 99 nondiabetic patients belonged to the catchment area of KS. 21 diabetic patients who belonged to KS catchment area were amputated at Danderyd University Hospital. All patients' case reports were searched for diagnoses of diabetes, vascular disorders, kidney disorders, and ulcer infections of the foot.

Results: There was a 60% reduction in the rate of amputations performed above the ankle in patients with DM during the study period. Patients with DM who underwent amputations were more commonly affected by foot infections and kidney disorders compared to the nondiabetic control group. Women with DM were 10 years older than the men when amputated, whereas men with DM underwent more multiple amputations and had more foot infections compared to the women. 88% of all diabetes-related amputations were preceded by foot ulcers. Only 30% of the patients had been referred to the multidisciplinary foot team prior to the decision of amputation.

Conclusions: These findings indicate a reduced rate of major amputations in diabetic patients, which suggests an implementation of the consensus guidelines of foot care. We also propose further reduced amputation rates if patients with an increased risk of future amputation (i.e. male sex, kidney disease) are identified and offered preventive treatment early.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of amputations and selection of patients. A, B and C. The arrows indicate events of amputations. D. Referral patterns and selection of study subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Amputation rates across time. A. Amputation rate in nondiabetic and diabetic patients from the catchment area of KS. B. Amputation rate in diabetic patients from the catchment area of KS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Age at event of amputation. A. Mean age at event of amputation in nondiabetic and diabetic patients. One-way ANOVA: p < 0.05, Bonferroni post hoc analysis: **p < 0.01 D- all patients vs. D + all patients, *** p < 0.001 D + female vs. D + male, *p < 0.05 D- male vs. D + male. Bars represent means + S.E.M. B. Mean age at event of amputation in diabetic patients. Error bars represent S.E.M.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Foot ulcers and foot care. A. Percentage of patients with foot ulcers and of patients who received foot care prior to the amputation. B. Annual distribution of foot ulcers and foot care prior to amputation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comorbidities. A. Distribution of comorbidities in nondiabetic and diabetic patients. Unpaired t test: ***p < 0.001 D- vs. D+. B. Distribution of comorbidities in diabetic female and male patients. Unpaired t test: *p < 0.05 F vs. M.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matricali GA, Dereymaeker G, Muls E, Flour M, Mathieu C. Economic aspects of diabetic foot care in a multidisciplinary setting: a review. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2007;23:339–347. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.706. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsson J, Agardh CD, Apelqvist J, Stenström A. Long-term prognosis after healed amputation in patients with diabetes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;350:149–158. - PubMed
    1. Pecoraro RE, Reiber GE, Burgess EM. Pathways to diabetic limb amputation. Basis for prevention. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:513–521. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.5.513. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeffcoate WJ, van Houtum WH. Amputation as a marker of the quality of foot care in diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004;47:2051–2058. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1584-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sumpio BE. Foot Ulcers. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:787–793. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009143431107. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms