Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Mar;129(3 Suppl):S24-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.980.

Asthma outcomes: composite scores of asthma control

Michelle M Cloutier  1 , Michael Schatz, Mario Castro, Noreen Clark, H William Kelly, Rita Mangione-Smith, James Sheller, Christine Sorkness, Stuart Stoloff, Peter Gergen
Affiliations
Review

Asthma outcomes: composite scores of asthma control

Michelle M Cloutier et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Current asthma guidelines recommend assessing the level of a patient's asthma control. Consequently, there is increasing use of asthma control as an outcome measure in clinical research studies. Several composite assessment instruments have been developed to measure asthma control.

Objective: National Institutes of Health institutes and federal agencies convened an expert group to propose the most appropriate standardized composite score of asthma control instruments to be used in future asthma studies.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed using both the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings and key terms to identify studies that attempted to develop and/or test composite score instruments for asthma control. We classified instruments as core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to study aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at a National Institutes of Health-organized workshop convened in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

Results: We identified 17 composite score instruments with published validation information; all had comparable content. Eight instruments demonstrated responsiveness over time; 3 demonstrated responsiveness to treatment. A minimal clinically important difference has been established for 3 instruments. The instruments have demographic limitations; some are proprietary, and their use could be limited by cost.

Conclusion: Two asthma composite score instruments are sufficiently validated for use in adult populations, but additional research is necessary to validate their use in nonwhite populations. Gaps also exist in validating instruments for pediatric populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mattke S, Martorell F, Sharma P, Malveaux F, Lurie N. Quality of care for childhood asthma: estimating impact and implications. Pediatrics. 2009;123(Suppl 3):S199–204. Epub 2009/04/16. - PubMed
    1. Reddel HK, Taylor DR, Bateman ED, Boulet LP, Boushey HA, Busse WW, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(1):59–99. Epub 2009/06/19. - PubMed
    1. O’Byrne PM, Reddel HK, Eriksson G, Ostlund O, Peterson S, Sears MR, et al. Measuring asthma control: a comparison of three classification systems. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(2):269–76. Epub 2010/01/30. - PubMed
    1. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma, Full Report 2007. Bethesda (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2007.
    1. Juniper EF, O’Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(4):902–7. Epub 1999/11/26. - PubMed