Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Mar;129(3 Suppl):S88-123.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.988.

Asthma outcomes: quality of life

Sandra R Wilson  1 , Cynthia S Rand, Michael D Cabana, Michael B Foggs, Jill S Halterman, Lynn Olson, William M Vollmer, Rosalind J Wright, Virginia Taggart
Affiliations
Review

Asthma outcomes: quality of life

Sandra R Wilson et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Background: "Asthma-related quality of life" (QOL) refers to the perceived impact that asthma has on the patient's QOL.

Objective: National Institutes of Health institutes and other federal agencies convened an expert group to recommend standardized measures of the impact of asthma on QOL for use in future asthma clinical research.

Methods: We reviewed published documentation regarding the development and psychometric evaluation; clinical research use since 2000; and extent to which the content of each existing QOL instrument provides a unique, reliable, and valid assessment of the intended construct. We classified instruments as core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to the study's aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at an National Institutes of Health-organized workshop convened in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

Results: Eleven instruments for adults and 6 for children were identified for review. None qualified as core instruments because they predominantly measured indicators of asthma control (symptoms and/or functional status); failed to provide a distinct, reliable score measuring all key dimensions of the intended construct; and/or lacked adequate psychometric data.

Conclusions: In the absence of existing instruments that meet the stated criteria, currently available instruments are classified as either supplemental or emerging. Research is strongly recommended to develop and evaluate instruments that provide a distinct, reliable measure of the patient's perception of the impact of asthma on all of the key dimensions of QOL, an important outcome that is not captured in other outcome measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mattke S, Martorell F, Sharma P, Malveaux F, Lurie N. Quality of care for childhood asthma: estimating impact and implications. Pediatrics. 2009;123(Suppl 3):S199–S204. Epub 2009/04/16. - PubMed
    1. Reddel HK, Taylor DR, Bateman ED, Boulet LP, Boushey HA, Busse WW, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(1):59–99. Epub 2009/06/19. - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC)]: 1999. National Council on Measurement in Education, Association AER.
    1. Haave E, Hyland ME. Norwegian versions of the Living with Asthma Questionnaire (LWAQ) and Asthma Bother Profile (ABP), validation and comparison of two asthma groups. Scand J Psychol. 2004;45(2):163–167. Epub 2004/03/16. - PubMed
    1. Nishimura K, Hajiro T, Oga T, Tsukino M, Sato S, Ikeda A. A comparison of two simple measures to evaluate the health status of asthmatics: the Asthma Bother Profile and the Airways Questionnaire 20. J Asthma. 2004;41(2):141–146. Epub 2004/04/30. - PubMed