Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 May;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-7.
doi: 10.1002/ajh.23143. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

Cancer and coagulation

Affiliations
Review

Cancer and coagulation

Alok A Khorana. Am J Hematol. 2012 May.

Abstract

Thromboembolism, including both venous and arterial events, occurs commonly amongst patients with cancer. The occurrence of thromboembolism has significant consequences for cancer patients, including direct and indirect associations with mortality, morbidity, requirement for long-term anticoagulant therapy and consumption of healthcare resources. Recent studies have resulted in a better understanding of clinical risk factors and biomarkers of cancer-associated thrombosis, and a risk assessment model incorporating both has now been validated in multiple settings. Thromboprophylaxis with either unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) has been shown to be safe and effective in high-risk settings such as hospitalization for medical illness and the postsurgical period. Emerging new data from randomized studies have focused on outpatient prophylaxis, suggesting potential benefits in this setting as well. Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis requires long-term anticoagulation with LMWH. Results from ongoing and planned trials of novel anticoagulants in the cancer setting are awaited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Thromboprophylaxis in the Outpatient Setting
Rates of VTE (%) in four recent RCTs of LMWH prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors are shown. These included PROTECHT (P= 0.02) and SAVE-ONCO (both included various locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors) and CONKO-004 (P <0.01) and FRAGEM (P = 0.019) both included advanced pancreatic cancers only).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer. 2007;110:2339–2346. - PubMed
    1. Moore RA, Adel N, Riedel E, et al. High incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with Cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a large retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol. 29:3466–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khorana AA, Dalal M, Lin J, et al. Venous thromboembolism in the cancer outpatient setting: contemporary rates and predictors in the United States. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis O-MO-131. 2011
    1. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A, et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood. 2002;100:3484–8. - PubMed
    1. Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen JH, et al. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1846–50. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms