Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale
- PMID: 22389231
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291663
Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale
Abstract
Introduction: The Global Rating Scale (GRS) is a quality assurance program that was developed in England to assess patient-centered care in endoscopy. The aim of the current study was to evaluate patient experiences of colonoscopy using the GRS in order to compare different departments and to provide benchmarks. The study also evaluated factors associated with patient satisfaction.
Methods: A GRS questionnaire was used both before and after the procedure in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. The questionnaire assessed the processes associated with the colonoscopy, from making the appointment up until discharge. Mean values and ranges of 12 endoscopy departments were calculated together with P values in order to assess heterogeneity.
Results: In total, 1904 pre-procedure and 1532 (80 %) post-procedure questionnaires were returned from 12 endoscopy departments. The mean time patients had to wait for their procedure was 4.3 weeks (range 3.1 - 5.8 weeks), and 54 % (range 35 - 64 %; P < 0.001) reported being given a choice of appointment dates/times. Discomfort during colonoscopy was reported by 20 % (range 8 - 40 %; P < 0.001). Recovery room privacy was satisfactory for 76 % of patients (range 66 - 90 %; P < 0.05). The majority of patients reported being sufficiently informed about what to do in case of problems after discharge (79 %, range 43 - 98 %; P < 0.001), and 85 % of individuals stated that they would be willing to repeat the colonoscopy procedure (range 72 - 92 %; P < 0.001). Factors associated with a decreased willingness to return were the burdensome bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25; P < 0.001), "rushing staff" attitude (OR = 0.57; P < 0.05), low acceptance of the procedure (OR = 0.42; P < 0.01), and more discomfort than expected (OR = 0.54; P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Overall patient experiences with colonoscopy were satisfactory, but they also showed considerable variation. This study shows that use of a GRS patient questionnaire is feasible in the Dutch endoscopy setting for the assessment of patient experience. The significant variability between endoscopy units can be used to benchmark services and enable shortcomings to be identified.
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Similar articles
-
The Global Rating Scale in clinical practice: a comprehensive quality assurance programme for endoscopy departments.Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Nov;44(11):919-24. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.06.021. Epub 2012 Jul 25. Dig Liver Dis. 2012. PMID: 22840567
-
The incidence of 30-day adverse events after colonoscopy among outpatients in the Netherlands.Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;107(6):878-84. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.40. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22391645
-
Development and validation of the patient and clinician sedation satisfaction index for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Feb;7(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Sep 20. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 18930167
-
Quality assurance for endoscopists.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;25(3):349-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.05.003. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21764003 Review.
-
A literature review of quality in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy from the patient perspective.Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec;25(12):681-5. doi: 10.1155/2011/590356. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 22175059 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy units.VideoGIE. 2017 May 26;2(6):119-140. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2017.02.007. eCollection 2017 Jun. VideoGIE. 2017. PMID: 29905282 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
What constitutes patient-centred care for women: a theoretical rapid review.Int J Equity Health. 2019 Nov 26;18(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1048-5. Int J Equity Health. 2019. PMID: 31771588 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinician-reported Gloucester Comfort Scale scores underestimate patient discomfort and pain during colonoscopy: insights from comparison with a patient-reported experience measure.Endoscopy. 2025 Jun;57(6):645-657. doi: 10.1055/a-2528-5578. Epub 2025 Jan 29. Endoscopy. 2025. PMID: 39880000 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb;7(1):21-44. doi: 10.1177/2050640618810242. Epub 2018 Nov 4. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019. PMID: 30788114 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized health services study.Endosc Int Open. 2019 Apr;7(4):E537-E544. doi: 10.1055/a-0830-4648. Epub 2019 Apr 3. Endosc Int Open. 2019. PMID: 31041371 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical