Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;15(4):184-95.
doi: 10.1177/1084713811430837. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

Assembly and insertion of a self-fitting hearing aid: design of effective instruction materials

Affiliations
Review

Assembly and insertion of a self-fitting hearing aid: design of effective instruction materials

Andrea Caposecco et al. Trends Amplif. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

A self-fitting hearing aid has been proposed as a viable option to meet the need for rehabilitation in areas where audiology services are unreliable. A successful outcome with a self-fitting hearing aid pivots in part on the clarity of the instructions accompanying the device. The aims of this article are (a) to review the literature to determine features that should be incorporated into written health-care materials and factors to consider in the design process when developing written instructions for a target audience of older adults and (b) to apply this information to the development of a set of written instructions as the first step in self-fitting of a hearing aid, assembling four parts and inserting the aid into the ear. The method involved a literature review of published peer reviewed research. The literature revealed four steps in the development of written health-care materials: planning, design, assessment of suitability, and pilot testing. Best practice design principles for each step were applied in the development of instructions for how to assemble and insert a hearing aid. Separate booklets were developed for the left and right aids and the content of each consisted of simple line drawings accompanied by captions. The reading level was Grade 3.5 equivalent and the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 91.1 indicating that the materials were "very easy" to read. It is essential to follow best practice design principles when developing written health-care materials to motivate the reader, maximize comprehension, and increase the likelihood of successful application of the content.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Four steps in the development of written health-care materials
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example pages taken from the SFHA instructions (continued on next page)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albright J., de Guzman C., Acebo P., Paiva D., Faulkner M., Swanson J. (1996). Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Applied Nursing Research, 9, 139-143 - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2005). Vision problems among older Australians. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/aus/bulletin27/bulletin27.pdf
    1. Badarudeen S., Sabharwal S. (2008). Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 90, 199-204. 10.2106/jbjs.g.00347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker D. W., Gazmararian J. A., Williams M. V., Scott T., Parker R. M., Green D., . . . Peel J. (2002). Functional health literacy and the risk of hospital admission among Medicare managed care enrollees. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1278-1283 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker D. W., Parker R. M., Williams M. V. (1997). The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1027-1030 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms