The comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia
- PMID: 22389770
- PMCID: PMC3263570
- DOI: 10.5402/2011/219287
The comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia
Erratum in
-
Erratum to "the comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia".ISRN Pediatr. 2013 Mar 28;2013:206546. doi: 10.1155/2013/206546. Print 2013. ISRN Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23691351 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background. Functional dyspepsia is a common chronic disorder with non specific upper abdominal pain or discomfort. Different approaches with anti-secretory, spasmolytic, prokinetic and anti-inflammatory effects and most preferably reduction of visceral hypersensitivity seem logical. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of the four most drugs used for treatment of dyspepsia in children. Methods. 169 patients between 2 to 16 years old that 47.3% was male and 52.7% was female were enrolled in this clinical trial study by the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia. Then for each patient one of the drugs; Omeprazole, Famotidine, Ranitidine or Cimetidine was administered, for a period of 4 weeks. Patients were followed after 2 and 6 weeks from the beginning of the treatment. Results. The distribution of drugs between these patients were including; 21.9% with Cimetidine, 21.3% with Famotidine, 30.8% with Omeperazole and 26% with Ranitidine that the proportion of patients with all symptoms relief were: 21.6% for Cimetidine, 44.4% for Famotidine, 53.8% for Omeprazole and 43.2% for Cimetidine (P = .024). In followups within 2 and 6 weeks after beginning medical therapy, no side effects due to drugs were seen. Conclusion. If a cure is defined as all symptoms relief after a period of 4 weeks treatment, our findings showed that Omeperazole are superior to Ranitidine, Famotidine, and Cimetidine for management of functional dyspepsia.
Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of the effect of omeprazole, cimetidine, famotidine and ranitidine on histamine induced cutaneous wheal and flare response.Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1993 Jul;31(7):322-5. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1993. PMID: 8103763 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing lansoprazole with ranitidine or famotidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Jul;7(7):661-5. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995. PMID: 8590162
-
The management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice: a comparison of an omeprazole versus an antacid-alginate/ranitidine management strategy. Compete Research Group [corrected].Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Mar;12(3):263-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00282.x. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998. PMID: 9570261 Clinical Trial.
-
Molecular pharmacological approaches to effects of capsaicinoids and of classical antisecretory drugs on gastric basal acid secretion and on indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal damage in human healthy subjects (mini review).Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(1):84-9. doi: 10.2174/13816128130112. Curr Pharm Des. 2013. PMID: 22946903 Review.
-
Comparison of famotidine with cimetidine and ranitidine.Clin Pharm. 1988 Apr;7(4):271-84. Clin Pharm. 1988. PMID: 2896559 Review.
Cited by
-
Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: child/adolescent.Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1527-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.063. Gastroenterology. 2006. PMID: 16678566 Free PMC article.
-
How does one choose the appropriate pharmacotherapy for pediatric patients with functional dyspepsia?Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Nov;20(16):1921-1924. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1650021. Epub 2019 Aug 6. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019. PMID: 31387402 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Eosinophils and mast cells as therapeutic targets in pediatric functional dyspepsia.World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov 6;4(4):86-96. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v4.i4.86. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2013. PMID: 24199024 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An Update on the Assessment and Management of Pediatric Abdominal Pain.Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2021 Aug 6;12:373-393. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S287719. eCollection 2021. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2021. PMID: 34393542 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacological interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 6;3(3):CD010973. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010973.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28262913 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allescher HD. Functional dyspepsia—a multicausal disease and its therapy. Phytomedicine. 2006;13(1):2–11. - PubMed
-
- Soo S, Moayyedi P, Deeks J, Delaney B, Lewis M, Forman D. Psychological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005 Article ID CD002301. - PubMed
-
- Tack J, Broeckaert D, Coulie B, Janssens J. The influence of cisapride on gastric tone and the perception of gastric distension. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 1998;12(8):761–766. - PubMed
-
- Lori A, Mahajan LA, Kaplan B. Chronic abdominal pain of childhood and adolescence. Pediatric Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Pathophysiology/Diagnosis/Management. (3rd edition) 2006;7:112–125.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical