Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila
- PMID: 22389880
- PMCID: PMC3289778
- DOI: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.133
Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila
Abstract
Background: Differentiation of atypical pathogens is important for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In this study, we compared sputum and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for use in detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP), Chlamydophila pneumoniae (CP), and Legionella pneumophila (LP), using Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE Detection Assay (PneumoBacter; Seegene).
Methods: Sputum and NPS specimens were collected from patients in 15 hospitals. DNA was extracted from sputum using QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen) and from NPS using easyMAG (bioMérieux). Both types of specimens were evaluated by multiplex PCR using PneumoBacter. To determine the diagnostic performance of this assay, sputum samples were also tested using BD ProbeTec ET Atypical Pneumonia Assay (APA; Becton Dickinson).
Results: Among 217 sputum and NPS, 20 (9.2%), 2 (0.9%), and 0 sputum were positive for MP, LP, and CP, respectively, whereas 8 (3.7%) NPS were positive for MP. The sputum APA test yielded 186, 206, and 204 interpretable results for MP, LP, and CP, respectively. Of these, 21 (11.3%) were positive for MP, 2 (1.0%) were positive for LP, and 0 samples were positive for CP. Compared to APA, the sensitivity and specificity of the sputum assay for MP were 95.2% and 100.0%, respectively, whereas for the NPS assay, these were 38.1% and 93.9%. Sputum testing was more sensitive than NPS testing (P=0.002). For LP and CP diagnosis, PneumoBacter and APA tests agreed 100%.
Conclusions: Specimen type is crucial and sputum is preferred over NPS for simultaneous detection of MP, LP, and CP using multiplex PCR in CAP.
Keywords: Atypical pneumonia; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Legionella pneumophila; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Nasopharyngeal swab; Polymerase chain reaction; Sputum.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Development of a multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory tract secretions.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Feb;45(2):85-95. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00484-4. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003. PMID: 12614979
-
Development and evaluation of Chlamylege, a new commercial test allowing simultaneous detection and identification of Legionella, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical respiratory specimens by multiplex PCR.J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jul;43(7):3247-54. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3247-3254.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16000443 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, or Chlamydia pneumoniae lower respiratory infection using the polymerase chain reaction on a single throat swab specimen.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Jan;24(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00254-5. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996. PMID: 8988757 Clinical Trial.
-
[Atypical pneumonia].Orv Hetil. 2005 Aug 21;146(34):1759-66. Orv Hetil. 2005. PMID: 16184877 Review. Hungarian.
-
The atypical pneumonias: clinical diagnosis and importance.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 May;12 Suppl 3:12-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01393.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006. PMID: 16669925 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic performance of multiplex PCR on pulmonary samples versus nasopharyngeal aspirates in community-acquired severe lower respiratory tract infections.J Clin Virol. 2018 Nov;108:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 29. J Clin Virol. 2018. PMID: 30195090 Free PMC article.
-
Association between lipid profiles and viral respiratory infections in human sputum samples.Respir Res. 2022 Jul 2;23(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02091-w. Respir Res. 2022. PMID: 35780155 Free PMC article.
-
Multicenter Evaluation of BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 for Detection of Viruses and Bacteria in Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples.J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6):e01945-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01945-17. Print 2018 Jun. J Clin Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 29593057 Free PMC article.
-
Case report: The value of early application of mNGS technology in the diagnosis and treatment of severe Legionnaires' disease: reports of two cases with different outcomes.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 5;12:1501192. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1501192. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39975683 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles of Procalcitonin and Other Tools in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 26;13(11):1869. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111869. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37296721 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Blasi F. Atypical pathogens and respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 2004;24:171–181. - PubMed
-
- Chong YP, Jung KS, Lee KH, Kim MN, Moon SM, Park S, et al. The bacterial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Korea: a nationwide prospective multicenter study. Infect Chemother. 2010;42:397–403.
-
- Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I, et al. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax. 2009;64(Suppl 3):iii1–iii55. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous