Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Mar;32(2):133-8.
doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.133. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila

Min-Chul Cho  1 , Hyewon Kim, Dongheui An, Miyoung Lee, Shin-Ae Noh, Mi-Na Kim, Young Pil Chong, Jun Hee Woo
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila

Min-Chul Cho et al. Ann Lab Med. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Differentiation of atypical pathogens is important for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In this study, we compared sputum and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for use in detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP), Chlamydophila pneumoniae (CP), and Legionella pneumophila (LP), using Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE Detection Assay (PneumoBacter; Seegene).

Methods: Sputum and NPS specimens were collected from patients in 15 hospitals. DNA was extracted from sputum using QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen) and from NPS using easyMAG (bioMérieux). Both types of specimens were evaluated by multiplex PCR using PneumoBacter. To determine the diagnostic performance of this assay, sputum samples were also tested using BD ProbeTec ET Atypical Pneumonia Assay (APA; Becton Dickinson).

Results: Among 217 sputum and NPS, 20 (9.2%), 2 (0.9%), and 0 sputum were positive for MP, LP, and CP, respectively, whereas 8 (3.7%) NPS were positive for MP. The sputum APA test yielded 186, 206, and 204 interpretable results for MP, LP, and CP, respectively. Of these, 21 (11.3%) were positive for MP, 2 (1.0%) were positive for LP, and 0 samples were positive for CP. Compared to APA, the sensitivity and specificity of the sputum assay for MP were 95.2% and 100.0%, respectively, whereas for the NPS assay, these were 38.1% and 93.9%. Sputum testing was more sensitive than NPS testing (P=0.002). For LP and CP diagnosis, PneumoBacter and APA tests agreed 100%.

Conclusions: Specimen type is crucial and sputum is preferred over NPS for simultaneous detection of MP, LP, and CP using multiplex PCR in CAP.

Keywords: Atypical pneumonia; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Legionella pneumophila; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Nasopharyngeal swab; Polymerase chain reaction; Sputum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results of the multiplex PCR Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE Detection Assay. Lane M, amplicon size marker. Bands of 583 bp, 472 bp, and 146 bp are characteristic of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae, respectively. Lane 1, negative control; Lanes 2 and 3, nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and sputum samples from an Mycoplasma pneumoniae-positive patient; Lanes 4 and 5, NPS and sputum samples from a Legionella pneumophila-positive patient; Lane 6, positive control.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Blasi F. Atypical pathogens and respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 2004;24:171–181. - PubMed
    1. Cunha BA. The atypical pneumonias: clinical diagnosis and importance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(Suppl 3):12–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chong YP, Jung KS, Lee KH, Kim MN, Moon SM, Park S, et al. The bacterial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Korea: a nationwide prospective multicenter study. Infect Chemother. 2010;42:397–403.
    1. Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I, et al. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax. 2009;64(Suppl 3):iii1–iii55. - PubMed
    1. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(Suppl 2):S27–S72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources