Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Mar 2;14(2):e39.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.1742.

Development of web-based computer-tailored advice to promote physical activity among people older than 50 years

Denise A Peels  1 , Maartje M van Stralen, Catherine Bolman, Rianne Hj Golsteijn, Hein de Vries, Aart N Mudde, Lilian Lechner
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Development of web-based computer-tailored advice to promote physical activity among people older than 50 years

Denise A Peels et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Active Plus project is a systematically developed theory- and evidence-based, computer-tailored intervention, which was found to be effective in changing physical activity behavior in people aged over 50 years. The process and effect outcomes of the first version of the Active Plus project were translated into an adapted intervention using the RE-AIM framework. The RE-AIM model is often used to evaluate the potential public health impact of an intervention and distinguishes five dimensions: reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.

Objective: To gain insight into the systematic translation of the first print-delivered version of the Active Plus project into an adapted (Web-based) follow-up project. The focus of this study was on the reach and effectiveness dimensions, since these dimensions are most influenced by the results from the original Active Plus project.

Methods: We optimized the potential reach and effect of the interventions by extending the delivery mode of the print-delivered intervention into an additional Web-based intervention. The interventions were adapted based on results of the process evaluation, analyses of effects within subgroups, and evaluation of the working mechanisms of the original intervention. We pretested the new intervention materials and the Web-based versions of the interventions. Subsequently, the new intervention conditions were implemented in a clustered randomized controlled trial.

Results: Adaptations resulted in four improved tailoring interventions: (1) a basic print-delivered intervention, (2) a basic Web-based intervention, (3) a print-delivered intervention with an additional environmental component, and (4) a Web-based version with an additional environmental component. Pretest results with participants showed that all new intervention materials had modest usability and relatively high appreciation, and that filling in an online questionnaire and performing the online tasks was not problematic. We used the pretest results to improve the usability of the different interventions. Implementation of the new interventions in a clustered randomized controlled trial showed that the print-delivered interventions had a higher response rate than the Web-based interventions. Participants of both low and high socioeconomic status were reached by both print-delivered and Web-based interventions.

Conclusions: Translation of the (process) evaluation of an effective intervention into an adapted intervention is challenging and rarely reported. We discuss several major lessons learned from our experience.

Trial registration: Nederlands Trial Register (NTR): 2297; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2297 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/65TkwoESp).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the selection and response of participants. SES = socioeconomic status.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timeline of the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rodgers A, Vaughan P, Prentice T, Tan-Torres Edejer T, Evans D, Lowe J. World Health Organization. 2002. [2011-08-12]. The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/whr02_en.pdf.
    1. Department of Health, Physical Activity, Health Improvement and Prevention . At Least Five a Week: Evidence on the Impact of Physical Activity and its Relationship to Health. London: Department of Health; 2004. [2012-02-21]. At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/docu....
    1. The Swedish National Institute of Public Health . Healthy Ageing: A Challenge for Europe. Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health; 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_projects/2003/action1/docs/2003_1_....
    1. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1435–45. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616aa2.00005768-200708000-00028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A, American College of Sports Medicine. American Heart Association Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1081–93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649. http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17671237CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types