Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation
- PMID: 22392974
- PMCID: PMC3325652
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111784109
Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation
Abstract
Exceptionally preserved fossil biotas of the Burgess Shale and a handful of other similar Cambrian deposits provide rare but critical insights into the early diversification of animals. The extraordinary preservation of labile tissues in these geographically widespread but temporally restricted soft-bodied fossil assemblages has remained enigmatic since Walcott's initial discovery in 1909. Here, we demonstrate the mechanism of Burgess Shale-type preservation using sedimentologic and geochemical data from the Chengjiang, Burgess Shale, and five other principal Burgess Shale-type deposits. Sulfur isotope evidence from sedimentary pyrites reveals that the exquisite fossilization of organic remains as carbonaceous compressions resulted from early inhibition of microbial activity in the sediments by means of oxidant deprivation. Low sulfate concentrations in the global ocean and low-oxygen bottom water conditions at the sites of deposition resulted in reduced oxidant availability. Subsequently, rapid entombment of fossils in fine-grained sediments and early sealing of sediments by pervasive carbonate cements at bed tops restricted oxidant flux into the sediments. A permeability barrier, provided by bed-capping cements that were emplaced at the seafloor, is a feature that is shared among Burgess Shale-type deposits, and resulted from the unusually high alkalinity of Cambrian oceans. Thus, Burgess Shale-type preservation of soft-bodied fossil assemblages worldwide was promoted by unique aspects of early Paleozoic seawater chemistry that strongly impacted sediment diagenesis, providing a fundamentally unique record of the immediate aftermath of the "Cambrian explosion."
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
A perfect (geochemical) storm yielded exceptional fossils in the early ocean.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 3;109(14):5138-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202201109. Epub 2012 Mar 23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 22447777 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Does cement-induced sulfate limitation account for Burgess Shale-type preservation?Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):E1901; author reply E1902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206878109. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 22745175 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Allison PA, Briggs DEG. Exceptional fossil record: Distribution of soft-tissue preservation through the Phanerozoic. Geology. 1993;21:527–530.
-
- Conway Morris S. Environments and Physiology of Fossil Organisms, Vol. 80. Edinburgh: Royal Soc Edinburgh; 1989. The persistence of Burgess Shale-type faunas: Implications for the evolution of deeper-water faunas; pp. 271–283. (Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Science).
-
- Gaines RR, Briggs DEG, Zhao YL. Cambrian Burgess Shale-type deposits share a common mode of fossilization. Geology. 2008;36:755–758.
-
- Butterfield NJ. Secular distribution of Burgess-Shale-type preservation. Lethaia. 1995;28:1–13.
-
- Gabbott SE, Hou XG, Norry MJ, Siveter DJ. Preservation of Early Cambrian animals of the Chengjiang biota. Geology. 2004;32:901–904.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
