Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):360-6.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00008.

Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study

Lucas S Zier  1 , Peter D Sottile, Seo Yeon Hong, Lisa A Weissfield, Douglas B White
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study

Lucas S Zier et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Little is known about why surrogate decision makers for patients with advanced illness often have overly optimistic expectations about prognosis.

Objective: To determine how surrogates interpret prognostic statements and to explore factors influencing surrogates' interpretations of grim prognostic information.

Design: Multicenter, mixed-methods study.

Setting: Intensive care units of 3 hospitals in San Francisco, California.

Participants: 80 surrogates of critically ill patients.

Measurements: Participants recorded their interpretation of 16 prognostic statements using a standard probability scale. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine whether participants interpreted statements more optimistically as the expressed probability of survival decreased. Fifteen surrogates whose responses exhibited this trend participated in a semistructured interview.

Results: Participants' interpretations of prognostic statements expressing a low risk for death were relatively accurate, but interpretations of statements conveying a high risk for death were more optimistic than the actual meaning (P < 0.001; generalized estimating equation model). Interpretations of the statement "90% chance of surviving" did not differ from the actual meaning, but interpretations of "5% chance of surviving" were more optimistic and showed substantial variability (median, 90% [interquartile range, 90% to 95%; P = 0.11] vs. 15% [interquartile range, 5% to 40%; P < 0.001], respectively). Two main themes from the interviews explained this trend: surrogates' need to register optimism in the face of a poor prognosis and surrogates' belief that patient attributes unknown to the physician would lead to better-than-predicted outcomes.

Limitation: Surrogates' interpretations were elicited in an experimental setting rather than during actual clinician-surrogate conversations.

Conclusion: Inaccurate interpretations of physicians' prognostications by surrogates arise partly from optimistic biases rather than simply from misunderstandings.

Primary funding source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts of Interest: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M11-2047.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surrogate decision makers’ interpretations of physicians’ prognostic statements.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Study flow diagram
ICU = intensive care unit.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Summary for patients in

References

    1. Lloyd CB, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Intensive care decision making in the seriously ill and elderly. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:649–54. - PubMed
    1. Murphy DJ, Burrows D, Santilli S, Kemp AW, Tenner S, Kreling B, et al. The influence of the probability of survival on patients’ preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:545–9. - PubMed
    1. Zier LS, Burack JH, Micco G, Chipman AK, Frank JA, White DB. Surrogate decision makers’ responses to physicians’ predictions of medical futility. Chest. 2009;136:110–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA. 1995;274:1591–8. - PubMed
    1. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3044–9. - PubMed

Publication types