Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy
- PMID: 22395145
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824b1966
Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy
Abstract
Objective: To estimate, after correction for patient factors, to what extent blood loss, operative time, and adverse events are decisive factors for the successful outcome of laparoscopic hysterectomy. A secondary objective was to estimate to what extent a successful outcome can be predicted from surgical experience or other measures of surgical skill.
Methods: A nationwide multivariate 1-year cohort analysis was conducted with gynecologists who perform laparoscopic hysterectomy. The primary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, and adverse events. The procedures were corrected for multiple covariates in a mixed-effects logistic regression model. Furthermore, all primary outcomes were related to experience and the influence of individual surgical skills factors.
Results: One thousand five hundred thirty-four laparoscopic hysterectomies were analyzed for 79 surgeons. The success of the surgical outcome was significantly influenced by uterus weight, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, previous abdominal surgeries, and the type of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Surgical experience also predicted the successful outcome of laparoscopic hysterectomy with respect to blood loss and adverse events (P=.048 and .036, respectively). A significant improvement in surgical outcomes tends to continue up to approximately 125 procedures. Independently from surgical experience, an individual surgical skills factor was identified as odds ratio 1.67 and 3.60 for blood loss and operative time, respectively.
Conclusion: After adjusting for risk factors, it was shown that an increase in experience positively predicted a successful outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy with respect to blood loss and adverse events. However, the independent surgical skills factor shows a large variation in proficiency between individuals. The fact that a surgeon has performed many laparoscopic hysterectomies does not necessarily guarantee good surgical outcome.
Level of evidence: II.
Comment in
-
Experience counts.Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):693-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824daa80. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22433331 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of surgical volume on outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications.Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):709-16. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318248f7a8. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22433333
-
Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2011 Dec;118(13):1568-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03089.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6. BJOG. 2011. PMID: 21895949 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.006. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23312244 Review.
-
Risk factors to predict the incidence of surgical adverse events following open or laparoscopic surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 12. Eur J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22503396 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.J Reprod Med. 1994 Aug;39(8):625-30. J Reprod Med. 1994. PMID: 7996527 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Single-Surgeon Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India.Cureus. 2025 Feb 26;17(2):e79675. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79675. eCollection 2025 Feb. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40161168 Free PMC article.
-
LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 5;13(9):e070218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070218. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37669836 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a Fellowship-Trained Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeon on Patient Outcomes.JSLS. 2017 Jul-Sep;21(3):e2017.00037. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00037. JSLS. 2017. PMID: 28951655 Free PMC article.
-
Conversion in endometrial cancer patients scheduled for laparoscopic staging: a large multicenter analysis: conversions and endometrial cancer.Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3200-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3589-4. Epub 2014 Jul 9. Surg Endosc. 2014. PMID: 25005010
-
Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity.Perm J. 2020;24:19.035. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.035. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Perm J. 2020. PMID: 31905335 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials