Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 22:(60):3606.
doi: 10.3791/3606.

Reproducible mouse sciatic nerve crush and subsequent assessment of regeneration by whole mount muscle analysis

Affiliations

Reproducible mouse sciatic nerve crush and subsequent assessment of regeneration by whole mount muscle analysis

Andrew R Bauder et al. J Vis Exp. .

Abstract

Regeneration in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is widely studied both for its relevance to human disease and to understand the robust regenerative response mounted by PNS neurons thereby possibly illuminating the failures of CNS regeneration(1). Sciatic nerve crush (axonotmesis) is one of the most common models of peripheral nerve injury in rodents(2). Crushing interrupts all axons but Schwann cell basal laminae are preserved so that regeneration is optimal(3,4). This allows the investigator to study precisely the ability of a growing axon to interact with both the Schwann cell and basal laminae(4). Rats have generally been the preferred animal models for experimental nerve crush. They are widely available and their lesioned sciatic nerve provides a reasonable approximation of human nerve lesions(5,4). Though smaller in size than rat nerve, the mouse nerve has many similar qualities. Most importantly though, mouse models are increasingly valuable because of the wide availability of transgenic lines now allows for a detailed dissection of the individual molecules critical for nerve regeneration(6, 7). Prior investigators have used multiple methods to produce a nerve crush or injury including simple angled forceps, chilled forceps, hemostatic forceps, vascular clamps, and investigator-designed clamps(8,9,10,11,12). Investigators have also used various methods of marking the injury site including suture, carbon particles and fluorescent beads(13,14,1). We describe our method to obtain a reproducibly complete sciatic nerve crush with accurate and persistent marking of the crush-site using a fine hemostatic forceps and subsequent carbon crush-site marking. As part of our description of the sciatic nerve crush procedure we have also included a relatively simple method of muscle whole mount we use to subsequently quantify regeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pan YA, Misgeld T, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Effects of neurotoxic and neuroprotective agents on peripheral nerve regeneration assayed by time-lapse imaging in vivo. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:11479–11488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magill C, Tong A, Kawamura D, Hayashi A, Hunter D. Reinnervation of the tibialis anterior following sciatic nerve crush injury: A confocal microscopic study in transgenic mice. Exp. Neurol. 2007;207:64–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amado S, Simñes MJ, Armada-da-Silva PAS, Luís AL, Shirosaki Y. Use of hybrid chitosan membranes and N1E-115 cells for promoting nerve regeneration in an axonotmesis rat model. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4409–4419. - PubMed
    1. Luís AL, Rodrigues JM, Geuna S, Amado S, Simðes MJ. Neural cell transplantation effects on sciatic nerve regeneration after a standardized crush injury in the rat. Microsurgery. 2008;28:458–470. - PubMed
    1. Luís AL, Amado S, Geuna S, Rodrigues JM, Simðes MJ. Long-term functional and morphological assessment of a standardized rat sciatic nerve crush injury with a non-serrated clamp. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2007;163:92–104. - PubMed

Publication types