Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;9(2):150-62.
doi: 10.1007/s10393-012-0747-9. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

A one health framework for estimating the economic costs of zoonotic diseases on society

Affiliations

A one health framework for estimating the economic costs of zoonotic diseases on society

Clare Narrod et al. Ecohealth. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

This article presents an integrated epidemiological and economic framework for assessing zoonoses using a "one health" concept. The framework allows for an understanding of the cross-sector economic impact of zoonoses using modified risk analysis and detailing a range of analytical tools. The goal of the framework is to link the analysis outputs of animal and human disease transmission models, economic impact models and evaluation of risk management options to gain improved understanding of factors affecting the adoption of risk management strategies so that investment planning includes the most promising interventions (or sets of interventions) in an integrated fashion. A more complete understanding of the costs of the disease and the costs and benefits of control measures would promote broader implementation of the most efficient and effective control measures, contributing to improved animal and human health, better livelihood outcomes for the poor and macroeconomic growth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Modified risk analysis framework to enhance reduction of zoonotic disease burden.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of dog–human rabies transmission (Zinsstag et al. , with permission).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Costs and benefits of Brucellosis control in Mongolia (Roth et al. 2003). Intervention cost (black), public health benefits (oblique lines), private health benefits (vertical lines), reduced household income loss (horizontal lines), agricultural benefits (white).

References

    1. Abbate R, Di Giuseppe G, Marinelli P, Angelillo IF. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of avian influenza, poultry workers, Italy. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2006;12:1762–1765. doi: 10.3201/eid1211.060671. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arrow K, Solow R, Leamer E, Portney P, Radner R, Schuman H. Report on the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. U.S. Federal Register. 1993;58:4602–4614.
    1. Bennett R. The ‘direct costs’ of livestock diseases: the development of a system of models for the analysis of 30 Endemic Livestock Diseases in Great Britain. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2003;54(1):55–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00048.x. - DOI
    1. Birol E, Asare-Marfo D, Ayele G, Mensah-Bonsu A, Ndirangu L, Okpukpara B, Roy D, Yakhshilikov Y (2010) Investigating the role of poultry in livelihoods and the impact of HPAI on livelihoods outcomes in Africa: evidence from Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE) 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19–23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa
    1. Bonfoh B, Kasymbekov J, Dürr S, Toktobaev N, Doherr MG, Schueth T, Zinsstag J, Schelling E (2011) Representative seroprevalences of Brucellosis in humans and livestock in Kyrgyzstan. Ecohealth. doi:10.1007/s10393-011-0722-x - PMC - PubMed

Publication types