Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May-Jun;7(5-6):E293-8.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11224. Epub 2013 May 13.

How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer?

Affiliations

How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer?

Ege Can Serefoglu et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 May-Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate biopsies incur the risk of being false-negative and this risk has not yet been evaluated for 12-core prostate biopsy. We calculated the false-negative rate of 12-core prostate biopsy and determined the patient characteristics which might affect detection rate.

Methods: We included 90 prostate cancer patients (mean age of 64, range: 49-77) diagnosed with transrectal ultrasound guided 12-core prostate biopsy between December 2005 and April 2008. All patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and the 12-core prostate biopsy procedure was repeated on surgical specimen ex-vivo. Results of preoperative and postoperative prostate biopsies were compared. We analyzed the influence of patient age, prostate weight, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, free/total PSA ratio, PSA density and Gleason score on detection rate.

Results: In 67.8% of patients, prostate cancer was detected with repeated ex-vivo biopsies using the same mapping postoperatively. We found an increase in PSA level, PSA density and biopsy Gleason score; patient age, decreases in prostate weight and free/total PSA ratio yielded higher detection rates. All cores, except the left-lateral cores, showed mild-moderate or moderate internal consistency. Preoperative in-vivo biopsy Gleason scores remained the same, decreased and increased in 43.3%, 8.9% and 47.8% of patients, respectively, on final specimen pathology.

Conclusions: The detection rate of prostate cancer with 12-core biopsy in patients (all of whom had prostate cancer) was considerably low. Effectively, repeat biopsies can still be negative despite the patient's reality of having prostate cancer. The detection rate is higher if 12-core biopsies are repeated in younger patients, patients with high PSA levels, PSA density and Gleason scores, in addition in patients with smaller prostates, lower free/total PSA ratios.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mapping of the prostate.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Sensitivity change regarding patient’s age, prostate weight, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, free/total PSA ratio, PSA density and Gleason scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989;142:71–4. discussion 74–5. - PubMed
    1. Ravery V, Dominique S, Panhard X, et al. The 20-core prostate biopsy protocol–a new gold standard? J Urol. 2008;179:504–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scattoni V, Raber M, Abdollah F, et al. Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95% of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Raber M, et al. Initial extended transrectal prostate biopsy–are more prostate cancers detected with 18 cores than with 12 cores? J Urol. 2008;179:1327–31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.052. discussion 1331. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998;159:471–5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63951-X. discussion 475–6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources