Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;21(10):2105-12.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2211-5. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the Spine Society of Europe (years 2000-2003)

Tobias L Schulte  1 , Katharina Huck, Nani Osada, Matthias Trost, Tobias Lange, Carolin Schmidt, Georg Gosheger, Viola Bullmann
Affiliations

Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the Spine Society of Europe (years 2000-2003)

Tobias L Schulte et al. Eur Spine J. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: The quality of presentations at medical conferences is of major importance. The publication rate (PR) following congress presentation is an indicator of the extent and quality of a scientific society's activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate publication rates in the Spine Society of Europe (SSE), compare them with the results for American spine societies, and determine factors affecting publication.

Materials and methods: All 839 abstracts of podium and poster presentations at SSE congresses held in 2000-2003 were investigated. PRs in peer-reviewed journals within a period of 5 years were assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed for different study types. The consistency of abstracts with publications was also analyzed.

Results: The overall PR was 37.8%, with a mean of 17.7 ± 15.7 months between congress and publication and a mean impact factor of 1.8 ± 1.0 at the time of publication. Comparatively high PRs were found for podium presentations versus posters, studies with higher versus lower levels of evidence, experimental versus clinical studies, prospective versus retrospective studies, randomized versus nonrandomized studies, studies reporting significant main results versus those without, and multicenter studies versus single-center studies. Biomechanical studies also achieved high PRs.

Conclusion: The PR was similar to that of NASS (40%) and only slightly inferior to that of SRS (47%) and ISSLS (45%). This shows the high quality of presentations at SSE congresses. The fate of unpublished abstracts is worth further consideration. It is questionable whether it is acceptable to cite abstracts that have not passed a journal's peer-review process and to implement their results in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The publication rate for all 317 publications during a follow-up period of 5 years after each congress. Twenty-five abstracts (3.0% of all 839 abstracts, 7.9% of all 317 publications) were published before congress presentation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Spine Society of Europe. Eurospine 2000. Eur Spine J 9(4):282–368
    1. Abstracts of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Spine Society of Europe. Eurospine 2001. Eur Spine J 10(Suppl 1):S1–83 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abstracts of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Spine Society of Europe. Eurospine 2002. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 1):S2–62 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abstracts of the 5th Annual Meeting of the Spine Society of Europe. Eurospine 2003. Eur Spine J 12(Suppl 1):S1–79 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2002;84-A(4):615–621. - PubMed

MeSH terms