Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;82(3):149-55.
doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.149. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

The effect of erythromycin on gastrointestinal motility in subtotal gastrectomized patients

Affiliations

The effect of erythromycin on gastrointestinal motility in subtotal gastrectomized patients

A-Lan Lee et al. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to determine the effect of erythromycin (EM) in improving gastrointestinal motility in subtotal gastrectomized patients. We used radio-opaque Kolomarks as an objective method. We conducted a prospective, controlled clinical trial study of 24 patients.

Methods: All patients underwent subtotal gastrectomy with 3 capsules containing Kolomarks (20 markers per 1 capsule) in the remnant stomach before anastomosis. From the day of the operation to the 2nd postoperative day, patients in the EM group began receiving 200 mg of EM intravenously for 30 minutes continuously. We counted the number of Kolomarks in the stomach, passed by stomach, in rectum, and in stool with serial simple abdominal X-ray films on the first postoperative day up to the 7th postoperative day.

Results: The study population included 14 patients in the control group and 10 patients in the EM group. The two study groups were compared in terms of their characteristics including age, gender, past medical history, cancer stage, and operation type. No significant differences were found for the demographics between the two groups. We only found a significant difference for the number of Kolomarks passed by the stomach on the 3rd postoperative day (P = 0.026).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that 200 mg of EM intravenous infusion during the postoperative period induced rapid gastric emptying, although it did not improve gastrointestinal motility for the entire gastrointestinal tract in subtotal gastrectomized patients.

Keywords: Erythromycin; Gastrointestinal motility; Kolomark; Postoperative ileus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Abdominal X-ray film in erythromycin group on 1st postoperative day. There are 57 Kolomarks in stomach.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Abdominal X-ray film in erythromycin group on 3rd postoperative day. All Kolomarks were passed by stomach.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Abdominal X-ray film in erythromycin group on 5th postoperative day. Picture shows that most Kolomarks in the gastrointestinal tract remained except 4.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Abdominal X-ray film in erythromycin group on 7th postoperative day. Twenty Kolomarks are remained in gastrointestinal tract.

References

    1. Maron DJ, Fry RD. New therapies in the treatment of postoperative ileus after gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Ther. 2008;15:59–65. - PubMed
    1. Tack J, Janssens J, Vantrappen G, Peeters T, Annese V, Depoortere I, et al. Effect of erythromycin on gastric motility in controls and in diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:72–79. - PubMed
    1. Mozwecz H, Pavel D, Pitrak D, Orellana P, Schlesinger PK, Layden TJ. Erythromycin stearate as prokinetic agent in postvagotomy gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:902–905. - PubMed
    1. Bonacini M, Quiason S, Reynolds M, Gaddis M, Pemberton B, Smith O. Effect of intravenous erythromycin on postoperative ileus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:208–211. - PubMed
    1. Burt M, Scott A, Williard WC, Pommier R, Yeh S, Bains MS, et al. Erythromycin stimulates gastric emptying after esophagectomy with gastric replacement: a randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:649–654. - PubMed