Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;82(3):172-8.
doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.172. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery

Affiliations

Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery

Hyung Ook Kim et al. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy is performed using three ports, and single-port appendectomy is an attractive alternative in order to improve cosmesis. The aim of this study was to compare pain after transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SA) with pain after conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TA).

Methods: From April to September 2011, 50 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for simple appendicitis without gangrene or perforation. Patients who had undergone appendectomy with a drainage procedure were excluded. The type of surgery was chosen based on patient preference after written informed consent was obtained. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain evaluated by the visual analogue scale score and postoperative analgesic use. Operative time, recovery of bowel function, and length of hospital stay were secondary outcome measures.

Results: SA using a SILS port (Covidien) was performed in 17 patients. The other 33 patients underwent TA. Pain scores in the 24 hours after surgery were higher in patients who underwent SA (P = 0.009). The change in postoperative pain score over time was significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.021). SA patients received more total doses of analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) in the 24 hours following surgery, but the difference was not statistically significant. The median operative time was longer for SA (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgeons should be concerned about longer operation times and higher immediate postoperative pain scores in patients who undergo SA.

Keywords: Appendicitis; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Postoperative pain; SILS port; Single incision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SA). (A) Preoperative view. (B) A longitudinal umbilical incision about 20 mm in length. (C) The SILS port was inserted into the umbilical incision. (D) External view during SA. (E) The mesoappendix was first divided using ultrasonic shears. (F) The base of the appendix was ligated using a round loop. (G, H) The resected appendix was removed with the aid of a bag.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Postoperative pain score on the visual analogue scale according to the number of ports as a function of time after laparoscopic appendectomy. a)Pain in the 24 hours after surgery was higher in patients who underwent transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (P = 0.009; corrected by Bonferroni's method).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The change in the visual analogue scale pain score as a function of postoperative time was significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.021 by repeated measures analysis of variance).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Example of cosmetic results in this study. (A) At the time of closure. (B) Seven days postoperatively.

References

    1. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2011;254:927–932. - PubMed
    1. Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:266–269. - PubMed
    1. Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1199–1208. - PubMed
    1. Chouillard E, Dache A, Torcivia A, Helmy N, Ruseykin I, Gumbs A. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1861–1865. - PubMed
    1. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Nehme J, Darzi LA, Paraskeva P. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2567–2574. - PubMed