Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;105(4):157-65.
doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110256. Epub 2012 Mar 9.

Experiences of non-UK-qualified doctors working within the UK regulatory framework: a qualitative study

A Slowther  1 , G A Lewando Hundt, J Purkis, R Taylor
Affiliations

Experiences of non-UK-qualified doctors working within the UK regulatory framework: a qualitative study

A Slowther et al. J R Soc Med. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the experience of non-UK-qualified doctors in working within the regulatory framework of the General Medical Council (GMC) document Good Medical Practice.

Design: Individual interviews and focus groups.

Setting: United Kingdom.

Participants: Non-UK-qualified doctors who had registered with the GMC between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2008, doctors attending training/induction programmes for non-UK-qualified doctors, and key informants involved in training and support for non-UK-qualified doctors.

Main outcome measures: Themes identified from analysis of interview and focus group transcripts.

Results: Information and support for non-UK qualified doctors who apply to register to work in the UK has little reference to the ethical and professional standards required of doctors working in the UK. Recognition of the ethical, legal and cultural context of UK healthcare occurs once doctors are working in practice. Non-UK qualified doctors reported clear differences in the ethical and legal framework for practising medicine between the UK and their country of qualification, particularly in the model of the doctor-patient relationship. The degree of support for non-UK-qualified doctors in dealing with ethical concerns is related to the type of post they work in. European doctors describe similar difficulties with working in an unfamiliar regulatory framework to their non-European colleagues.

Conclusions: Non-UK-qualified doctors experience a number of difficulties related to practising within a different ethical and professional regulatory framework. Provision of information and educational resources before registration, together with in-practice support would help to develop a more effective understanding of GMP and its implications for practice in the UK.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. UK House of Commons Health Committee Fourth Report. Revalidation of Doctors. London: House of Commons, 2011. See http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmhealth/557/... (last accessed 28 March 2011)
    1. UK National Patient Safety Agency National Clinical Assessment Service. Concerns about professional practice and associations with age, gender, place of qualification and ethnicity – 2009/10 data. London: NCAS, 2011. See www.ncas.npsa.nhs.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=95145 (last accessed 28 March 2011)
    1. UK NHS Information Centre Medical and dental bulletin 1999–2009. London: NHS Information Centre, 2010. See http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/010_Workforce/nhsstaff9909/Me... (last accessed 30 March 2011)
    1. General Medical Council Good Medical Practice. London: GMC, 2006. See http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/index.asp (last accessed 28 March 2011)
    1. Chaturvedi SK Ethical dilemmas in palliative care in traditional developing societies, with special reference to the Indian setting. J Med Ethics 2008;34:611–15 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources