Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;82(6):1060-6.
doi: 10.2319/101311-640.1. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists

Affiliations

Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists

Chase Prettyman et al. Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if there are significant clinical differences between self-ligating brackets (SLB) and conventional brackets (CB) during orthodontic treatment, as perceived by orthodontists.

Materials and methods: A survey was developed and distributed to evaluate how SLB compare to CB in terms of orthodontists' perceptions (n = 430).

Results: SLB were preferred during the initial stage of treatment based on the shorter adjustment appointments and faster initial treatment progress they provided (P < .0001). On the other hand, practitioners preferred CB during the finishing and detailing stages of treatment (P < .0001). CB were also preferred over SLB because they were cheaper and resulted in fewer emergency appointments.

Conclusions: The orthodontists' preference was significantly influenced by (1) the proportion of patients treated with SLB (P < .0001), (2) the number of cases it took them to become accustomed to SLB (P < .0001), and (3) the average appointment intervals associated with SLB (P < .0001).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferences for SLB or CB for a variety of treatment factors. The bracket preferences are shown as 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Harradine N. W. T. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now. J Orthod. 2003;30:262. - PubMed
    1. Harradine N. W. The history and development of self-ligating brackets. Semin Orthod. 2008;14:5–18.
    1. Birnie D, Harradine N. W. Introduction. Semin Orthod. 2008;14:1–4.
    1. Rinchuse D. J, Miles P. G. Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:216–222. - PubMed
    1. Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:283–291. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources