Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Mar 12:7:21.
doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-21.

Left ventricular assist device implantation in high risk destination therapy patients: an alternative surgical approach

Affiliations
Case Reports

Left ventricular assist device implantation in high risk destination therapy patients: an alternative surgical approach

Louis E Samuels et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) for Destination Therapy (DT) is an established therapy for end stage heart failure patients who are not transplant candidates. Many DT patients requiring LVADs have had prior open heart surgery, the majority of whom had prior sternotomy. In addition, DT patients tend to be older and more likely to have more significant co-morbidities than their Bridge-To-Transplant (BTT) counterparts. As such, placement of an implantable LVAD in DT patients can be technically hazardous and potentially prone to more perioperative complications. The purpose of this report is to describe an alternative implantation approach for the implantation of the Heartmate II™ LVAD in high risk DT patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative Chest CT Scan.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preoperative plan with HM-II™ Model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraop Exposure of LV Apex.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intraoperative exposure of Aorta with Outflow Graft.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ. et al.Randomized evaluation of mechanical assistance for the treatment of congestive heart failure (REMATCH) study group. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frazier OH. Current Status of Cardiac Transplantation and Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(3):319–321. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lietz K, Miller LW. Patient selection for left-ventricular assist devices. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009;24:246–251. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32832a0743. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slaughter MS, Meyer AL, Birks EJ. Destination Therapy with left ventricular assist devices: patient selection and outcomes. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26(3):232–6. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328345aff4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mookadam F, Kendall CB, Wong RK. et al.Left ventricular assist devices: physiologic assessment using echocardiography for management and optimization. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38(2):335–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.11.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types