Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials
- PMID: 22412055
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis021
Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials
Abstract
Background: Invasive candidiasis (IC) is an important healthcare-related infection, with increasing incidence and a crude mortality exceeding 50%. Numerous treatment options are available yet comparative studies have not identified optimal therapy.
Methods: We conducted an individual patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials for treatment of IC and to assess the impact of host-, organism-, and treatment-related factors on mortality and clinical cure. Studies were identified by searching computerized databases and queries of experts in the field for randomized trials comparing the effect of ≥2 antifungals for treatment of IC. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine factors associated with patient outcomes.
Results: Data from 1915 patients were obtained from 7 trials. Overall mortality among patients in the entire data set was 31.4%, and the rate of treatment success was 67.4%. Logistic regression analysis for the aggregate data set identified increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.02; P = .02), the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08-1.14; P = .0001), use of immunosuppressive therapy (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.18-2.44; P = .001), and infection with Candida tropicalis (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.11-2.39; P = .01) as predictors of mortality. Conversely, removal of a central venous catheter (CVC) (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, .35-.72; P = .0001) and treatment with an echinocandin antifungal (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, .45-.94; P = .02) were associated with decreased mortality. Similar findings were observed for the clinical success end point.
Conclusions: Two treatment-related factors were associated with improved survival and greater clinical success: use of an echinocandin and removal of the CVC.
Comment in
-
The end of an era in defining the optimal treatment of invasive candidiasis.Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;54(8):1123-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis023. Epub 2012 Mar 12. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22412062 No abstract available.
-
Selection bias in Andes et al.Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(6):893-4; author reply 894-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis524. Epub 2012 Jun 18. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22711066 No abstract available.
-
Far-reaching conclusions based on weak and missing data.Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(6):890-3; author reply 894-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis521. Epub 2012 Jun 18. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22711067 No abstract available.
-
Does a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials on the outcomes in candidemia and invasive candidiasis need to include all patients?Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(10):1514-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit061. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Clin Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23386635 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Oude Lashof and Vogelaers.Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(10):1515-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit062. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Clin Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23386636 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources