Prospective and retrospective time estimates of children: a comparison based on ecological tasks
- PMID: 22412982
- PMCID: PMC3295787
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033049
Prospective and retrospective time estimates of children: a comparison based on ecological tasks
Abstract
Children's time estimation literature lacks of studies comparing prospective and retrospective time estimates of long lasting ecological tasks, i.e. tasks reflecting children's daily activities. In the present study, children were asked to estimate prospectively or retrospectively how much time they played a video game or read a magazine. Regardless of the task, the results revealed that prospective time estimates were longer than the retrospective ones. Also, time estimates of the video game task were longer, less accurate and more variable than those of the reading task. The results are discussed in the light of the current literature about time estimation of long lasting ecological tasks.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Block RA, Hancock PA, Zakay D. How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica. 2010;134:330–343. - PubMed
-
- Grondin S. Methods for studying psychological time. In: Grondin S, editor. Psychology of time. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing; 2008. pp. 51–74.
-
- Block RA, Zakay D. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1997;4:184–197. - PubMed
-
- Brown S. Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Perception & Psychophysics. 1985;38:115–124. - PubMed
-
- Grondin S. Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010;72:561–582. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources