Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009756.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009756.

Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection

Tara Horvath et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: More than 34 million people are presently living with HIV infection. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) can help these people to live longer, healthier lives, but adherence to ART can be difficult. Mobile phone text-messaging has the potential to help promote adherence in these patients.

Objectives: To determine whether mobile phone text-messaging is efficacious in enhancing adherence to ART in patients with HIV infection.

Search methods: Using the Cochrane Collaboration's validated search strategies for identifying randomised controlled trials and reports of HIV interventions, along with appropriate keywords and MeSH terms, we searched a range of electronic databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus. The date range was from 01 January 1980 to 01 November 2011. There were no limits to language or publication status.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients or their caregivers (in the case of infants and children) of any age, in any setting, and receiving ART were provided with mobile phone text messages as a means of promoting adherence to ART.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently examined the abstracts of all identified trials. We initially identified 243 references. Seventeen full-text articles were closely reviewed. Both authors abstracted data independently, using a pre-designed, standardised data collection form. When appropriate, data were combined in meta-analysis.

Main results: Two RCTs from Kenya were included in the review. One trial compared short weekly text messages against standard care. The other trial compared short daily, long daily, short weekly and long weekly messages against standard care. Both trials were with adult patients.In the trial comparing only short weekly messages to standard care, text messaging was associated with a lower risk of non-adherence at 12 months (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.93) and with the non-occurrence of virologic failure at 12 months (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.99).In the trial that compared different intervals and lengths for text-messaging to standard care, long weekly text-messaging was not significantly associated with a lower risk of non-adherence compared to standard care (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.04). Patients receiving weekly text-messages of any length were at lower risk of non-adherence at 48 weeks than were patients receiving daily messages of any length (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99). There were no significant differences between weekly text-messaging of any length (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37) and between short or long messaging at either interval (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.27). Compared to standard care, any daily text-messaging, whether short or long, did not reduce the risk for non-adherence (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.20).In meta-analysis of both trials, any weekly text-messaging (i.e. whether short or long messages) was associated with a lower risk of non-adherence at 48-52 weeks (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89). The effect of short weekly text-messaging was also significant (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.89).

Authors' conclusions: There is high-quality evidence from the two RCTs that mobile phone text-messaging at weekly intervals is efficacious in enhancing adherence to ART, compared to standard care. There is high quality evidence from one trial that weekly mobile phone text-messaging is efficacious in improving HIV viral load suppression. Policy-makers should consider funding programs proposing to provide weekly mobile phone text-messaging as a means for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Clinics and hospitals should consider implementing such programs. There is a need for large RCTs of this intervention in adolescent populations, as well as in high-income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No known conflicts of interest.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, outcome: 1.1 Viral load suppression at 52 weeks.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. control, outcome: 1.1 ART adherence at 48‐52 weeks: Text messages vs. standard care (overall).
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, outcome: 1.3 ART adherence at 48‐52 weeks: Weekly text messages vs. standard care (overall).
7
7
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, outcome: 1.4 ART adherence at 48‐52 weeks: Short weekly messages vs. standard care.
8
8
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, outcome: 1.5 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Long weekly messages vs. standard care.
9
9
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, outcome: 1.7 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Short daily messages vs. standard care.
10
10
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, outcome: 1.8 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Long daily messages vs. standard care.
11
11
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Mobile phone text messages (intervals and durations), outcome: 2.1 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Short weekly messages vs. long weekly messages.
12
12
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Mobile phone text messages (intervals and durations), outcome: 2.2 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Weekly vs. daily messages (overall).
13
13
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Mobile phone text messages (intervals and durations), outcome: 2.3 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Short vs. long messages (overall).
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 1 Viral load suppression at 52 weeks.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 2 ART adherence at 48‐52 weeks: Text messages vs. standard care (overall).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 3 ART adherence at 48‐52 weeks: Weekly text messages vs. standard care (overall).
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 4 ART adherence at 48‐52 weeks: Short weekly messages vs. standard care.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 5 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Long weekly messages vs. standard care.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 6 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Daily messages vs. standard care (overall).
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 7 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Short daily messages vs. standard care.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Mobile phone text messages vs. standard care, Outcome 8 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Long daily messages vs. standard care.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Mobile phone text messages (comparing different intervals and lengths), Outcome 1 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Short weekly messages vs. long weekly messages.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Mobile phone text messages (comparing different intervals and lengths), Outcome 2 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Weekly vs. daily messages (overall).
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Mobile phone text messages (comparing different intervals and lengths), Outcome 3 ART adherence at 48 weeks: Short vs. long messages (overall).

References

References to studies included in this review

Lester 2010 {published data only}
    1. Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, Kariri A, Karanja S, Chung MH, et al. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1838‐45. - PubMed
Pop‐Eleches 2011 {published data only}
    1. Pop‐Eleches C, Thirumurthy H, Habyarimana JP, Zivin JG, Goldstein MP, Walque D, et al. Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource‐limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS 2011;25(6):825‐34. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Ammassari 2011 {published data only}
    1. Ammassari A, Trotta MP, Shalev N, Tettoni MC, Maschi S, Sora F, et al. Timed short messaging service improves adherence and virological outcomes in HIV‐1‐infected patients with suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2011; Vol. 58, issue 4:e113‐5. [PUBMED: 22033235] - PubMed
Chi 2010 {published data only}
    1. Chi BH, Stringer JS. Mobile phones to improve HIV treatment adherence. Lancet 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1807‐8. - PubMed
De Costa 2010 {published data only}
    1. Costa A, Shet A, Kumarasamy N, Ashorn P, Eriksson B, Bogg L, et al. Design of a randomized trial to evaluate the influence of mobile phone reminders on adherence to first line antiretroviral treatment in South India‐‐the HIVIND study protocol. BMC medical research methodology 2010;10:25. [PUBMED: 20346136] - PMC - PubMed
Dowshen 2011 {published data only}
    1. Dowshen N, Kuhns L, Johnson A, Holoyda B, Garofalo R. Text Message Reminders to Improve Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV‐Positive Youth. Journal of Adolescent Health Feb 2011; Vol. Volume 48, Issue 2, Supplement 1:S64‐S65.
Haberer 2010 {published data only}
    1. Haberer JE, Kiwanuka J, Nansera D, Wilson IB, Bangsberg DR. Challenges in using mobile phones for collection of antiretroviral therapy adherence data in a resource‐limited setting. AIDS and Behavior 2010 Dec;14(6):1294‐301. - PMC - PubMed
Hardy 2011 {published data only}
    1. Hardy H, Kumar V, Doros G, Farmer E, Drainoni ML, Rybin D, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a personalized cellular phone reminder system to enhance adherence to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2011 Mar;25(3):153‐61. - PMC - PubMed
Kalichman 2011 {published data only}
    1. Kalichman SC, Kalichman MO, Cherry C, Swetzes C, Amaral CM, White D, et al. Brief behavioral self‐regulation counseling for HIV treatment adherence delivered by cell phone: an initial test of concept trial. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2011 May;25(5):303‐10. - PMC - PubMed
Kelly 2011 {published data only}
    1. Kelly JD, Giordano TP. Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource‐limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS 2011 May 15;25(8):1137; reply 8‐9. - PubMed
Mukund Bahadur 2010 {published data only}
    1. Mukund Bahadur KC, Murray PJ. Cell phone short messaging service (SMS) for HIV/AIDS in South Africa: a literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform 210;160:Pt 1:530‐534. - PubMed
Puccio 2006 {published data only}
    1. Puccio JA, Belzer M, Olson J, Martinez M, Salata C, Tucker D, et al. The use of cell phone reminder calls for assisting HIV‐infected adolescents and young adults to adhere to highly active antiretroviral therapy: a pilot study. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2006 Jun;20(6):438‐44. - PubMed
Reynolds 2008 {published data only}
    1. Reynolds NR, Testa MA, Su M, Chesney MA, Neidig JL, Frank I, et al. Telephone support to improve antiretroviral medication adherence: a multisite, randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008 Jan 1;47(1):62‐8. - PubMed
Saberi 2011 {published data only}
    1. Saberi P, Johnson MO. Technology‐based self‐care methods of improving antiretroviral adherence: a systematic review. PloS one 2011;6(11):e27533. [PUBMED: 22140446] - PMC - PubMed
Safren 2003 {published data only}
    1. Safren SA, Hendriksen ES, Desousa N, Boswell SL, Mayer KH. Use of an on‐line pager system to increase adherence to antiretroviral medications. AIDS Care 2003 Dec;15(6):787‐93. - PubMed
Simoni 2007 {published data only}
    1. Simoni JM, Pantalone DW, Plummer MD, Huang B. A randomized controlled trial of a peer support intervention targeting antiretroviral medication adherence and depressive symptomatology in HIV‐positive men and women. Health Psychol 2007 Jul;26(4):488‐95. - PMC - PubMed
Skinner 2007 {published data only}
    1. Skinner D, Rivette U, Bloomberg C. Evaluation of use of cellphones to aid compliance with drug therapy for HIV patients. AIDS Care 2007 May;19(5):605‐7. - PubMed
Wang 2008 {published data only}
    1. Wang H, He G, Li X, Yang A, Chen X, Fennie KP, et al. Self‐Reported adherence to antiretroviral treatment among HIV‐infected people in Central China. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2008 Jan;22(1):71‐80. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

da Costa 2012 {published data only}
    1. Costa TM, Barbosa BJ, E Costa DA, Sigulem D, Fatima Marin H, Filho AC, et al. Results of a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of a mobile SMS‐based intervention on treatment adherence in HIV/AIDS‐infected Brazilian women and impressions and satisfaction with respect to incoming messages. International journal of medical informatics 2012 Jan 30;[Epub ahead of print]:n/a. [PUBMED: 22296762] - PMC - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Mbuagbaw 2011 {published data only}
    1. Mbuagbaw L, Thabane L, Ongolo‐Zogo P, Lester RT, Mills E, Volmink J, Yondo D, Essi MJ, Bonono‐Momnougui RC, Mba R, Ndongo JS, Nkoa FC, Ondoa HA. The Cameroon mobile phone SMS (CAMPS) trial: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial of mobile phone text messaging versus usual care for improving adherence to highly active anti‐retroviral therapy. Trials 2011 Jan 7;12:5. PubMed PMID: 21211064;PubMed Central PMCID:PMC3023676. - PMC - PubMed
NCT01001741 {published data only}
    1. A Pilot Study of Cellular Phone Text Message Reminders to Improve HIV Medication Adherence at Independence Surgery Clinic Gaborone, Botswana. Ongoing study 2008.
NCT01049568 {published data only}
    1. A Pilot Study Using Cell Phone Interactions to Improve Medication Adherence in Adolescents Who Have Previously Failed Antiretroviral Therapy Due to Non‐Adherence. Ongoing study 2009.
NCT01118767 {published data only}
    1. Evaluation of a Computer‐Based System Using Cell Phones for HIV People in Peru. Ongoing study 2010.

Additional references

Anglemyer 2011
    1. Anglemyer A, Rutherford George W, Baggaley Rachel C, Egger M, Siegfried N. Antiretroviral therapy for prevention of HIV transmission in HIV‐discordant couples. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009153.pub2; CD009153] - DOI - PubMed
Atun 2006
    1. Atun RA, Sittampalam S. A review of the characteristics and benefits of SMS in delivering healthcare. In: Atun RA, et al. editor(s). The role of mobile phones in increasing accessibility and efficiency in healthcare. Vodafone Group Plc, 2006.
Bain‐Brickley 2011
    1. Bain‐Brickley D, Butler Lisa M, Kennedy Gail E, Rutherford George W. Interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in children with HIV infection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009513; CD009513] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Barnighausen 2011
    1. Barnighausen T, Chaiyachati K, Chimbindi N, Peoples A, Haberer J, Newell ML. Interventions to increase antiretroviral adherence in sub‐Saharan Africa: a systematic review of evaluation studies. The Lancet infectious diseases 2011;11(12):942‐51. [PUBMED: 22030332] - PMC - PubMed
Chang 2011
    1. Chang LW, Kagaayi J, Arem H, Nakigozi G, Ssempijja V, Serwadda D, et al. Impact of a mHealth intervention for peer health workers on AIDS care in rural Uganda: a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster‐randomized trial. AIDS and behavior 2011;15(8):1776‐84. [PUBMED: 21739286] - PMC - PubMed
GRADEpro 2008 [Computer program]
    1. Brozek J, Oxman A, Schünemann. GRADEpro. GRADE Working Group, 2008.
Guardian 2009
    1. Wray R. Africa sees massive growth in mobile web usage. The Guardian, 2009. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/22/mobilephones‐internet.
Guyatt 2008
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, Schunemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7650):924‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2008.
iTWire 2011
    1. Anonymous. Big three fuel Asia Pacific Mobile Growth. Available from: http://www.itwire.com/it‐industry‐news/market/49228‐big‐three‐fuel‐asia‐....
Leong 2006
    1. Leong KC, Chen WS, Leong KW, Mastura I, Mimi O, Sheikh MA, Zailinawati AH, Ng CJ, Phua KL, Teng CL. The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2006;23:699‐705. - PubMed
Liu 2008
    1. Liu Q, Abba K, Alejandria Marissa M, Balanag Vincent M, Berba Regina P, Lansang Mary Ann D. Reminder systems and late patient tracers in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006594.pub2; CD006594] - DOI - PubMed
Menon‐Johansson 2006
    1. Menon‐Johansson AS, McNaught F, Mandalia S, Sullivan AK. Texting decreases the time to treatment for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sexually transmitted infections 2006 Feb;82(1):49–51. - PMC - PubMed
Mills 2006
    1. Mills EJ, Nachega JB, Bangsberg DR, Singh S, Rachlis B, Wu P, Wilson K, Buchan I, Gill CJ, Cooper C. Adherence to HAART: A Systematic Review of Developed and Developing Nation Patient‐Reported Barriers and Facilitators. PLoS Med 2006 Nov;3(11):e438. - PMC - PubMed
Palella 1998
    1. Palella FJ, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1998 Mar 26;338(13):853‐60. - PubMed
RevMan 2011 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Rueda 2006
    1. Rueda S, Park‐Wyllie Laura Y, Bayoumi A, Tynan A‐M, Antoniou T, Rourke S, et al. Patient support and education for promoting adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001442.pub2; CD001442] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
UNAIDS 2011
    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Global HIV/AIDS Response: Epidemic update and health sector progress towards Universal Access. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2011.
WHO 2009
    1. World Health Organization. Millennium Development Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/mdg/info/en/.
WHO 2010
    1. World Health Organization. HIV drug resistance fact sheet. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/facts/drug_resistance/en/index.html.
Wise 2008
    1. Wise J, Operario D. Use of electronic reminder devices to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review. AIDS patient care and STDs 2008;22(6):495‐504. [PUBMED: 18462071] - PubMed

Publication types

Substances