Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;109(6):1175-84.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs047. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

Tree litter and forest understorey vegetation: a conceptual framework to understand the effects of tree litter on a perennial geophyte, Anemone nemorosa

Affiliations

Tree litter and forest understorey vegetation: a conceptual framework to understand the effects of tree litter on a perennial geophyte, Anemone nemorosa

Marie Baltzinger et al. Ann Bot. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background and aims: Litter is a key factor in structuring plant populations, through positive or negative interactions. The litter layer forms a mechanical barrier that is often strongly selective against individuals lacking hypocotyle plasticity. Litter composition also interacts with plant growth by providing beneficial nutrients or, inversely, by allowing harmful allelopathic leaching. As conspicuous litter fall accumulation is often observed under deciduous forests, interactions between tree litter and understorey plant populations are worthy of study.

Methods: In a 1-year ex-situ experiment, the effects of tree litter on the growth of Anemone nemorosa, a small perennial forest geophyte, were investigated. Three 'litter quantity' treatments were defined, representative of forest floor litter (199, 356·5 and 514 g m(-2)), which were crossed with five 'litter composition' treatments (Quercus petraea, Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Q. petraea + F. sylvatica and Q. petraea + C. betulus), plus a no-litter control. Path analysis was then used to investigate the pathways linking litter characteristics and components of adult plant growth.

Key results: As expected, the heavier the litter, the longer the petiole; rhizome growth, however, was not depreciated by the litter-induced petiole lengthening. Both rhizome mass increment and number of initiated buds marginally increased with the amount of litter. Rhizome mass increment was in fact determined primarily by leaf area and leaf life span, neither of which was unequivocally correlated with any litter characteristics. However, the presence of litter significantly increased leafing success: following a late frost event, control rhizomes growing in the absence of litter experienced higher leaf mortality before leaf unfolding.

Conclusions: The study questions the role of litter as a physical or chemical barrier to ground vegetation; to better understand this role, there is a need for ex-situ, longer-term experiments coupled with in-situ observations in the forest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Conceptual pattern linking quantity and quality of litter to Anemone growth. Low litter permeability, i.e. loose versus tightly interwoven litter structure – depending on the shape of tree leaves – together with litter quantity would force rhizomes to produce longer petioles on average (1a and 1b). In extreme cases, the litter would become impenetrable and no leaves could emerge through it, thus increasing leaf mortality (2a). Litter chemical composition could also favour (via nutrient supply) or hinder (chemical toxicity) plant growth (3a and 3b). Ramets with longer petioles may emerge later from the litter (2b). By increasing the energy cost of leafing, a longer petiole would result in a smaller leaf (2d) and/or earlier leaf withering (2c). The chemical properties of the litter would also affect leaf area (3b) and/or date of leaf withering (3a) by improving or deteriorating the growing conditions. Higher leaf mortality (5a), shorter leaf life span (5b) and/or smaller leaf area (5c) would ultimately result in reduced rhizome growth.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Rhizome growth according to litter quantity treatments. (A) Number of initiated buds and (B) rhizome mass increment. No significant differences were observed [generalized linear mixed model (A) and linear mixed model (B)].
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Initial path model before AIC selection.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Standardized path coefficients for significant paths included in the model linking litter quantity and composition to rhizome growth. Overall fitness of the model (χ262 = 58·24, P = 0·61). –0·52 for light litter, 0·19 for intermediate litter, 0·77 for heavy litter.

References

    1. Ampoorter E, De Schrijver A, De Frenne P, Hermy M, Verheyen K. Experimental assessment of ecological restoration options for compacted forest soils. Ecological Engineering. 2011;37:1734–1746.
    1. Badri M, Minchin P, Lapointe L. Effects of temperature on the growth of spring ephemeralsp: Crocus vernus. Physiologica Plantarum. 2007;130:67–76.
    1. Baeten L, Jacquemyn H, Van Calster H, et al. Low recruitment across life stages partly accounts for the slow colonization of forest herbs. Journal of Ecology. 2009;97:109–117.
    1. Baeten L, De Frenne P, Verheyen K, Graae B, Hermy M. Forest herbs in the face of global change: a single-species-multiple-threats approach for Anemone nemorosa. Plant Ecology and Evolution. 2010;143:19–30.
    1. Balandier P, Sonohat G, Sinoquet H, Varlet-Grancher C, Dumas Y. Characterisation, prediction and relationships between different wavebands of solar radiation transmitted in the understorey of even-aged oak (Quercus petraea, Quercus robur) stands. Trees – Structure and Function. 2006;20:363–370.

LinkOut - more resources