Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 15;18(6):1540-6.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2202.

Development and use of integral assays in clinical trials

Affiliations

Development and use of integral assays in clinical trials

Richard L Schilsky et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Clinical trials that include integral biomarkers to determine eligibility, assign treatment, or assess outcome must employ robust assays to measure the molecular analyte of interest. The decision to develop a biomarker assay into a test suitable for use in humans should be driven by clinical need, that is, there should be a clear clinical purpose for undertaking the test development. Supporting in vitro or in vivo research on the ability of the marker to distinguish subgroups of patients with a given characteristic is necessary. The magnitude of the difference in treatment effect expected with use of the marker should be sufficient to support differential treatment prescription for marker-positive and -negative patients. Analytical and clinical validation of the marker assay should be completed before the clinical trial is initiated to ensure that the assay is stable enough for clinical use throughout the trial. Clinical use of the assay requires that it be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-accredited laboratory, and the need to apply for an Investigational Device Exemption from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration should be considered. In this article we elaborate on the steps required to get a biomarker assay ready for use as an integral component of a clinical trial and give an example of the use of an integral assay in a phase III trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
CALGB 30801 Randomized phase III trial for Stage IIIB or IV non small cell lung cancer (adenocarcinoma, large cell, squamous or mixture). The trial will allow evaluation of the cut point for COX2 assay.
Fig 2
Fig 2

References

    1. Poste G, Carbone DP, Parkinson DR, Verweij J, Hewitt S, Jessup JM. Leveling the playing field: bringing development of biomarkers and molecular diagnostics up to the standards for drug development. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taube SE, Clark GM, Dancey JE, McShane LM, Sigman CC, Gutman SI. A Perspective on Challenges nd Issues in Biomarker Development and Drug and Biomarker Codevelopment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1453–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hewitt SM, Badve SS, True LD. The impact of pre-analytic factors in the design and application of integral biomarkers for directing patient therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams PM, Lively TG, Jessup JM, Conley BA. Bridging the Gap: Moving predictive and prognostic assays from research to clinical use. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valentin MA, Ma S, Zhao A, Legay F, Avrameas A. Validation of immunoassay for protein biomarkers: bioanalytical study plan implementation to support pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;55:869–77. - PubMed

Substances