Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;61(6):1519-26.
doi: 10.2337/db11-0784. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

Prevention of autoimmune diabetes by ectopic pancreatic β-cell expression of interleukin-35

Affiliations

Prevention of autoimmune diabetes by ectopic pancreatic β-cell expression of interleukin-35

Maria Bettini et al. Diabetes. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Interleukin (IL)-35 is a newly identified inhibitory cytokine used by T regulatory cells to control T cell-driven immune responses. However, the therapeutic potential of native, biologically active IL-35 has not been fully examined. Expression of the heterodimeric IL-35 cytokine was targeted to β-cells via the rat insulin promoter (RIP) II. Autoimmune diabetes, insulitis, and the infiltrating cellular populations were analyzed. Ectopic expression of IL-35 by pancreatic β-cells led to substantial, long-term protection against autoimmune diabetes, despite limited intraislet IL-35 secretion. Nonobese diabetic RIP-IL35 transgenic mice exhibited decreased islet infiltration with substantial reductions in the number of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, and frequency of glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein-specific CD8(+) T cells. Although there were limited alterations in cytokine expression, the reduced T-cell numbers observed coincided with diminished T-cell proliferation and G1 arrest, hallmarks of IL-35 biological activity. These data present a proof of principle that IL-35 could be used as a potent inhibitor of autoimmune diabetes and implicate its potential therapeutic utility in the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Generation of the NOD.RIP-IL35 transgenic mouse. A: Schematic diagram of transgene construct. B: Immunofluorescent detection of p35 and EBI3 expression in the pancreatic sections of NOD.RIP-IL35A and NOD.RIP-IL35B mice. C: Detection of IL-35 in supernatant collected from cultured transgenic islets isolated from NOD.scid (green circles), NOD.scid.RIP-IL35A (red circles), and NOD.scid.RIP-IL35B (dark red circles) mice. IL-35 was measured by sandwich ELISA with a coating of primary anti-p35 and secondary biotenylated anti-EBI3. Supernatant from the 293T-cell line transfected with p35-P2A-EBI3 construct (IL-35, black circles) or vector alone (VC, white circles) was used as a control. A representative of two independent experiments is shown; each dot represents islets from a single mouse (n = 4–5). Horizontal bars represent the median. (A high-quality digital representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
NOD.RIP-IL35 mice are protected from diabetes. NOD.RIP-IL35A (A) and NOD.RIP-IL35B (B) transgenic strains were monitored for diabetes development (n = 20–25) (***P < 0.0001, Kaplan-Meier). Insulitis and insulitis index were assessed in NOD.RIP-IL35A (black circles) (C and E) and NOD.RIP-IL35B (black circles) (D and F) transgenic strains and compared with wild-type NOD littermate controls (white circles). At least nine mice per group were analyzed at 5 and 10 weeks of age, and 3–9 mice per group were analyzed at 15–55 weeks of age (*P < 0.02, Mann-Whitney). D and F: Horizontal bars represent the median.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Transgenic expression of IL-35 confers protection against diabetes under stringent conditions. A: Ins2−/− mice were crossed with NOD.RIP-IL35B mice and monitored for diabetes onset (n = 20–28) (**P < 0.002; ***P < 0.0001, Kaplan-Meier). B: Diabetes was adoptively transferred to NOD.scid.RIP-IL35B mice by injecting 10 million splenocytes from 6- to 7-week-old female wild-type NOD mice (three separate experiments, n = 11–14). C: Diabetes was transferred by injecting 105 NY4.1 retrogenic T cells intravenously into NOD.scid-RIP-IL35B (n = 9). D: Diabetes was transferred with 5,000 CD4+ T cells sorted from the islets of 10-week-old mice in combination with CD4-depleted splenocytes from 7-week-old mice. Control group received splenocytes only (three separate experiments, n = 8–12).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Reduced T-cell infiltration and proliferation in NOD.RIP-IL35B mice. Numbers of CD4+ (A) and CD8+ (B) T cells were calculated based on flow cytometric analysis in spleens, ndLNs, PLNs, and purified islets of 10-week-old female mice (n = 7–16) (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney). C: Frequency of Foxp3+ cells was assessed in NOD.RIP-IL35B mice and compared with littermate controls (n = 15–17). In vivo CD4+ (D), CD8+ (E), and Foxp3+ (F) T-cell proliferation was assessed via BrdU incorporation after 4 h in vivo BrdU pulse (CD4+: n = 12–14; CD8+: n = 7–8; Foxp3+: n = 5) (*P < 0.02; **P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney). Ki67 staining of CD4+ (G), CD8+ (H), and Foxp3+ (I) T cells in organs of 10-week-old female wild-type and transgenic mice (n = 5–6). Horizontal bars represent the median.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Phenotypic analysis of islet infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in NOD.RIP-IL35B mice. A: Cytokine production by CD4+ T cells was analyzed after 5 h in vitro restimulation with PMA and ionomycin (n = 5–16) (*P < 0.04, Mann-Whitney). B: Frequency of IGRP tetramer (NRP-V7)-positive CD8+ T cells in 10-week-old female transgenic mice and littermate controls (n = 5–12) (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.009, Mann-Whitney). C: Numbers of naive IGRP-reactive CD8+ T cells in the thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs of 5-week-old female transgenic mice and littermate controls (n = 12). Horizontal bars represent the median.

References

    1. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS. Type 1 diabetes: new perspectives on disease pathogenesis and treatment. Lancet 2001;358:221–229 - PubMed
    1. Bettini M, Vignali DA. Regulatory T cells and inhibitory cytokines in autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol 2009;21:612–618 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkinson MA, Leiter EH. The NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes: as good as it gets? Nat Med 1999;5:601–604 - PubMed
    1. Luo X, Herold KC, Miller SD. Immunotherapy of type 1 diabetes: where are we and where should we be going? Immunity 2010;32:488–499 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chuang YP, Chu CH, Sytwu HK. Genetic manipulation of islet cells in autoimmune diabetes: from bench to bedside. Front Biosci 2008;13:6155–6169 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms