To VBAC or not to VBAC
- PMID: 22427748
- PMCID: PMC3302811
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001191
To VBAC or not to VBAC
Abstract
Catherine Spong discusses new research in PLoS Medicine that sheds more light on the risks of uterine rupture for women attempting a trial of labor following previous cesarean section.
Conflict of interest statement
The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Fitzpatrick K, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, et al. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS, et al. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean—patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1279–1295. - PubMed
-
- Eddleman KA, Malone FD, Sullivan L, Dukes K, Berkowitz RL, et al. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1067–1072. - PubMed
-
- Lin MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006;61:269–277. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources