Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jun;9(2):101-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11897-012-0087-7.

Role of physical training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Affiliations
Review

Role of physical training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Mark Haykowsky et al. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

About 50% or more of heart failure (HF) patients living in the community have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF), and the proportion is higher among women and the very elderly. A cardinal feature of HFpEF is reduced aerobic capacity, measured objectively as peak exercise pulmonary oxygen uptake (peak VO(2)), that results in decreased quality of life. Specifically, peak VO(2) of HFpEF patients is 30-70% lower than age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched control patients without HF. The mechanisms for the reduced peak VO(2) are due to cardiovascular and skeletal muscle dysfunction that results in reduced oxygen delivery to and/or utilization by the active muscles. Currently, four randomized controlled exercise intervention trials have been performed in HFpEF patients. These studies have consistently demonstrated that 3-6 months of aerobic training performed alone or in combination with strength training is a safe and effective therapy to increase aerobic capacity and endurance and quality of life in HFpEF patients. Despite these benefits, the physiologic mechanisms underpinning the improvement in peak exercise performance have not been studied; therefore, future studies are required to determine the role of physical training to reverse the impaired cardiovascular and skeletal muscle function in HFpEF patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Aerobic capacity in heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and control patients (Con) matched for age, sex, or comorbidities without heart failure. Peak VO2 peak oxygen uptake; Hyp hypertensive age-matched control patients

References

    1. Kitzman DW, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, Arnold A, Boineau R, Aurigemma G, Marino EK, Lyles M, Cushman M, Enright PL. Importance of heart failure with preserved systolic function in patients > or = 65 years of age. CHS Research Group. Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(4):413–9. - PubMed
    1. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Evans JC, Reiss CK, Levy D. Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(7):1948–55. - PubMed
    1. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, Austin PC, Fang J, Haouzi A, Gong Y, Liu PP. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):260–9. - PubMed
    1. Kitzman DW, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR, Sheikh KH, Sullivan MJ. Exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular systolic function: failure of the Frank-Starling mechanism. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(5):1065–72. - PubMed
    1. Borlaug BA, Melenovsky V, Russell SD, Kessler K, Pacak K, Becker LC, Kass DA. Impaired chronotropic and vasodilator reserves limit exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2006;114(20):2138–47. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms