Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jan 1;13(1):40-7.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1093.

Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study

Mariya R Bohari et al. J Contemp Dent Pract. .

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate four different techniques of caries excavation in primary teeth in terms of efficacy, efficiency and pain experienced during the procedure.

Materials and methods: Sample of 120 teeth from children aged 5 to 9 years were equally divided into 4 groups - Air rotor (group A), Carisolv (group B), Papacarie (group C) and Er:YAG laser (group D). Visual and tactile criteria along with DIAGNOdent pen value was used to evaluate efficacy. Time was recorded to determine efficiency and FLACC scale was used to assess the pain experienced.

Results: Air rotor and laser were more effective and efficient method whereas laser and CMCR methods were more comfortable methods.

Conclusion: Laser irradiation and CMCR methods are comparable to conventional methods in terms of effectiveness and are less painful methods.

Clinical significance: Newer techniques of CMCR and laser irradiation of dentinal caries are minimally invasive methods and are less painful and thus should be more frequently employed in pediatric dentistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources