Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr 15;175(8):838-46.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr389. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

Derivation and validation of the Denver Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) risk score for targeted HIV screening

Affiliations

Derivation and validation of the Denver Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) risk score for targeted HIV screening

Jason S Haukoos et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Targeted screening remains an important approach to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing. The authors aimed to derive and validate an instrument to accurately identify patients at risk for HIV infection, using patient data from a metropolitan sexually transmitted disease clinic in Denver, Colorado (1996-2008). With multivariable logistic regression, they developed a risk score from 48 candidate variables using newly identified HIV infection as the outcome. Validation was performed using an independent population from an urban emergency department in Cincinnati, Ohio. The derivation sample included 92,635 patients; 504 (0.54%) were diagnosed with HIV infection. The validation sample included 22,983 patients; 168 (0.73%) were diagnosed with HIV infection. The final score included age, gender, race/ethnicity, sex with a male, vaginal intercourse, receptive anal intercourse, injection drug use, and past HIV testing, and values ranged from -14 to +81. For persons with scores of <20, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and ≥50, HIV prevalences were 0.31% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20, 0.45) (n = 27/8,782), 0.41% (95% CI: 0.29, 0.57) (n = 36/8,677), 0.99% (95% CI: 0.63, 1.47) (n = 24/2,431), 1.59% (95% CI: 1.02, 2.36) (n = 24/1,505), and 3.59% (95% CI: 2.73, 4.63) (n = 57/1,588), respectively. The risk score accurately categorizes patients into groups with increasing probabilities of HIV infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection within each risk score category in the derivation and validation samples, Denver, Colorado, 1996–2008 and Cincinnati, Ohio, 1998--2010. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals are staggered for clarity. The risk score ranges from −14 to +81. Bars, 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Calibration (part A) and discrimination (part B) of a risk score designed to identify patients at risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, Denver, Colorado, 1996–2008 and Cincinnati, Ohio, 1998--2010. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.83, 0.88) in the derivation sample and 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.70, 0.78) in the validation sample.

Comment in

References

    1. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1–17. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett JG, Branson BM, Fenton K, et al. Opt-out testing for human immunodeficiency virus in the United States: progress and challenges. JAMA. 2008;300(8):945–951. - PubMed
    1. Haukoos JS, Hopkins E, Hull A, et al. HIV testing in emergency departments in the United States: a national survey. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(1 suppl 1):S10–S16. - PubMed
    1. Rothman RE, Hsieh YH, Harvey L, et al. 2009 US emergency department HIV testing practices. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(1 suppl 1):S3–S9. - PubMed
    1. Bogart LM, Howerton D, Lange J, et al. Scope of rapid HIV testing in urban U.S. hospitals. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(4):494–503. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types