Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Feb;24(1):2-21.
doi: 10.1123/pes.24.1.2.

Child-adult differences in muscle activation--a review

Affiliations
Review

Child-adult differences in muscle activation--a review

Raffy Dotan et al. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Children differ from adults in many muscular performance attributes such as size-normalized strength and power, endurance, fatigability and the recovery from exhaustive exercise, to name just a few. Metabolic attributes, such as glycolytic capacity, substrate utilization, and VO2 kinetics also differ markedly between children and adults. Various factors, such as dimensionality, intramuscular synchronization, agonist-antagonist coactivation, level of volitional activation, or muscle composition, can explain some, but not all of the observed differences. It is hypothesized that, compared with adults, children are substantially less capable of recruiting or fully employing their higher-threshold, type-II motor units. The review presents and evaluates the wealth of information and possible alternative factors in explaining the observations. Although conclusive evidence is still lacking, only this hypothesis of differential motor-unit activation in children and adults, appears capable of accounting for all observed child-adult differences, whether on its own or in conjunction with other factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Child—adult differences in torque kinetics. Data from Dotan et al. (29).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of suggested child—adult differences in muscle contractility stemming from differential motor-unit activation. Comparisons of size-normalized muscular force, velocity (solid lines), and power (dashed lines) relationships are shown. Children’s values are presented as percentages of adults’ maximal values (100%).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen LL, Aagaard P. Influence of maximal muscle strength and intrinsic muscle contractile properties on contractile rate of force development. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96:46–52. - PubMed
    1. Armatas V, Bassa E, Patikas D, Kitsas I, Zangelidis G, Kotzamanidis C. Neuromuscular differences between men and prepubescent boys during a peak isometric knee extension intermittent fatigue test. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010;22:205–217. - PubMed
    1. Arnold DL, Matthews PM, Radda GK. Metabolic recovery after exercise and the assessment of mitochondrial function in vivo in human skeletal muscle by means of 31P NMR. Magn Reson Med. 1984;1:307–315. - PubMed
    1. Asai H, Aoki J. Force development of dynamic and static contractions in children and adults. Int J Sports Med. 1996;17:170–174. - PubMed
    1. Asmussen E. Growth in muscular strength and power. In: Rarick G, editor. Physical Activity, Human Growth and Development. London: Academic Press; 1973. pp. 60–79.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources