Optimal intravertebral cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
- PMID: 22433500
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318254871c
Optimal intravertebral cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Abstract
Study design: A prospective follow-up study.
Objective: Assessment of the relation between accomplishment of pain relief through percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and the cemented fraction of the vertebral body and subsequent determination of the optimal intravertebral cement volume.
Summary of background data: The mechanism of pain relief of PVP as a treatment modality for painful OVCFs remains unclear. Generally, benefit of PVP is thought to result from stabilization of micromovements and collapse of the fractured vertebral body. However, studies indicating a relation between intravertebral cement volume and pain relief are lacking and an optimal value of the intravertebral cement volume is unknown.
Methods: One hunderd six patients who received PVP for 196 painful OVCFs were prospectively followed on back pain (score 0-10) and occurrence of new OVCFs during the first postoperative year. Patients were classified as responders (average postoperative back pain ≤ 6) and nonresponders (average postoperative back pain >6). The cemented fraction of the vertebral body was determined using volumetric analysis of the postoperative CT scan of the treated levels. Analysis was performed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and multivariable regression techniques.
Results: Twenty-nine patients (27.3%) were found to be nonresponders. Mean intravertebral cement volume in all 196 treated OVCFs was 3.94 mL (SD = 1.89, range 0.13-10.8). The mean cemented vertebral body fraction was significantly lower in nonresponders (0.15 vs. 0.21, P = 0.002). The ROC area-under-curve of the cemented fraction as a predictor of accomplishment of pain relief was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57-0.78, P = 0.006). In subgroups without specific influential factors (new OVCFs, intravertebral clefts), significantly stronger associations were found. A vertebral body fraction of 24% was identified as the optimal fraction to be cemented. This fraction corresponded to a 93% to 100% specificity for accomplishment of pain relief (i.e., few to no cases without pain relief in the presence of adequate cementing) without being significantly associated with a higher risk of occurrence of cement leakage or new OVCFs. Corresponding values for the recommended (optimal) intravertebral cement volume were provided based on its governing characteristics (fracture level, fracture severity, and patient's sex).
Conclusion: An optimal intravertebral cement volume was identified for accomplishment of pain relief through PVP in painful OVCFs. Appropriate thresholds were provided to guide the operator.
Comment in
-
Re: Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Bollen L, van Erkel AR, Dijkstra PD. Optimal intravertebral cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 2012;37:1747–55.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):372. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182796c51. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23104193 No abstract available.
-
In response.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):373. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827fd33b. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23407408 No abstract available.
-
Re: Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Bollen L, van Erkel AR, et al. Optimal intravertebral cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 2012;37:1747–55.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2303. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000056. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24335633 No abstract available.
-
In response.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2304. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000057. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24335634 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The intravertebral cleft in painful long-standing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty: diagnostic assessment and clinical significance.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15;37(11):974-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318238bf22. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22020580
-
The Optimal Volume Fraction in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Evaluated by Pain Relief, Cement Dispersion, and Cement Leakage: A Prospective Cohort Study of 130 Patients with Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture in the Thoracolumbar Vertebra.World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e677-e688. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.050. Epub 2018 Mar 16. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29555612
-
New vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a clustered analysis and the relevance of intradiskal cement leakage.Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):862-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120751. Epub 2012 Nov 30. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23204545 Clinical Trial.
-
Network meta-analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, nerve block, and conservative treatment for nonsurgery options of acute/subacute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in short-term and long-term effects.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11544. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011544. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30024546 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.Int J Surg. 2017 Nov;47:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 20. Int J Surg. 2017. PMID: 28939236 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 13;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03568-9. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 32791975 Free PMC article.
-
Computer-assisted simulated workplace-based assessment in surgery: application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance within a mixed-reality simulation.BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Jan 19;5(1):e000135. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000135. eCollection 2023. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023. PMID: 36687799 Free PMC article.
-
Is There a Dose-Response Relationship of Cement Volume With Cement Leakage and Pain Relief After Vertebroplasty?Dose Response. 2016 Dec 20;14(4):1559325816682867. doi: 10.1177/1559325816682867. eCollection 2016 Oct-Dec. Dose Response. 2016. PMID: 28182178 Free PMC article.
-
The significance of the best puncture side bone cement/vertebral volume ratio to prevent paravertebral vein leakage of bone cement during vertebroplasty: a retrospective study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jun 9;24(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06580-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37291552 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of multidetector CT Hounsfield unit measurements as a predictor of efficacy and complications in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 29;10:1333679. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1333679. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 38098844 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials