Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;4(1):18-23.
doi: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.18. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Effect of loading time on the survival rate of anodic oxidized implants: prospective multicenter study

Affiliations

Effect of loading time on the survival rate of anodic oxidized implants: prospective multicenter study

Seok-Gyu Kim et al. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of early loading on survival rate or clinical parameter of anodic oxidized implants during the 12-month postloading period.

Materials and methods: Total 69 implants were placed in 42 patients. Anodic oxidized implants (GS II, Osstem Cor., Busan, Korea) placed on the posterior mandibles were divided into two groups, according to their prosthetic loading times: test group (2 to 6 weeks), and control group (3 to 4 months). The implant survival rates were determined during one-year postloading period and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. The radiographic peri-implant bone loss and periodontal parameters were also evaluated and statistically analyzed by unpaired t-test.

Results: Total 69 implants were placed in 42 patients. The cumulative postloading implant survival rates were 88.89% in test group, compared to 100% in control group (P<.05). Periimplant marginal bone loss (T: 0.27±0.54 mm, C: 0.40±0.55 mm) and periodontal parameters showed no significant difference between the groups (P>.05).

Conclusion: Within the limitation of the present study, implant survival was affected by early loading on the anodic oxidized implants placed on posterior mandibles during one-year follow-up. Early implant loading did not influence peri-implant marginal bone loss, and periodontal parameters.

Keywords: Anodic oxidized; Loading time; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of implant lengths.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of implant diameters.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of submerged and non-submerged placement.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Average value of resonance frequency analysis at implant placement (ISQ-1) and at the final impression (ISQ-2).

References

    1. Bernard JP, Belser UC, Martinet JP, Borgis SA. Osseointegration of Brånemark fixtures using a single-step operating technique. A preliminary prospective one-year study in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:122–129. - PubMed
    1. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS, Testori T, Galante J, Zetterqvist L. A prospective multicenter study evaluating loading of osseotite implants two months after placement: one-year results. J Esthet Dent. 1998;10:280–289. - PubMed
    1. Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:255–261. - PubMed
    1. Payne AG, Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WD, Kumara R. Conventional and early loading of unsplinted ITI implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:603–609. - PubMed
    1. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Lazza A, Casentini P, Ghisolfi M, Iorio M, Vogel G. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:495–501. - PubMed