Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 23:12:14.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-14.

The positive impact of a facilitated peer mentoring program on academic skills of women faculty

Affiliations

The positive impact of a facilitated peer mentoring program on academic skills of women faculty

Prathibha Varkey et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: In academic medicine, women physicians lag behind their male counterparts in advancement and promotion to leadership positions. Lack of mentoring, among other factors, has been reported to contribute to this disparity. Peer mentoring has been reported as a successful alternative to the dyadic mentoring model for women interested in improving their academic productivity. We describe a facilitated peer mentoring program in our institution's department of medicine.

Methods: Nineteen women enrolled in the program were divided into 5 groups. Each group had an assigned facilitator. Members of the respective groups met together with their facilitators at regular intervals during the 12 months of the project. A pre- and post-program evaluation consisting of a 25-item self-assessment of academic skills, self-efficacy, and academic career satisfaction was administered to each participant.

Results: At the end of 12 months, a total of 9 manuscripts were submitted to peer-reviewed journals, 6 of which are in press or have been published, and another 2 of which have been invited to be revised and resubmitted. At the end of the program, participants reported an increase in their satisfaction with academic achievement (mean score increase, 2.32 to 3.63; P = 0.0001), improvement in skills necessary to effectively search the medical literature (mean score increase, 3.32 to 4.05; P = 0.0009), an improvement in their ability to write a comprehensive review article (mean score increase, 2.89 to 3.63; P = 0.0017), and an improvement in their ability to critically evaluate the medical literature (mean score increased from 3.11 to 3.89; P = 0.0008).

Conclusions: This facilitated peer mentoring program demonstrated a positive impact on the academic skills and manuscript writing for junior women faculty. This 1-year program required minimal institutional resources, and suggests a need for further study of this and other mentoring programs for women faculty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Women in Academic Medicine and Science, Statistics and Benchmarking Report. https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/
    1. Women in Academic Medicine Statistics and Medical School Benchmarking. https://www.aamc.org/download/53434/data/wimstats_2008.pdf
    1. Powell D, Scott JL, Rosenblatt M, Roth PB, Pololi L. Commentary: a call for culture change in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2010;85(4):586–587. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d7d4eb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Medical School Faculty Distribution by Gender and Rank, 2009. https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics/
    1. Levinson W, Tolle SW, Lewis C. Women in academic medicine. Combining career and family.[see comment][comment. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(22):1511–1517. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911303212205. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources