Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;23(5):613-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.01.078. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

Feasibility of ultrasound-guided intranodal lymphangiogram for thoracic duct embolization

Affiliations

Feasibility of ultrasound-guided intranodal lymphangiogram for thoracic duct embolization

Gregory J Nadolski et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To show the feasibility of opacifying the thoracic duct using ultrasound-guided intranodal lymphangiogram (IL) for thoracic duct embolization (TDE).

Materials and methods: Six patients (two women and four men, mean age, 59.2 y [range, 43-74 y]) underwent IL and TDE for chylothorax. Under ultrasound guidance, a needle was positioned in a groin lymph node, and lipiodol was injected. The thoracic duct was catheterized, and embolization was performed as indicated. Cumulative times from start of the procedure until initiation of the lymphangiogram, until identification of target lymphatic, until catheterization of the thoracic duct, and until completion of the procedure were collected. Times were compared with times of a control group of six patients (two women and four men, mean age, 66.7 y [range, 49-82 y]) who had undergone TDE using pedal lymphangiography (PL).

Results: The procedure of opacification, catheterization, and embolization of the thoracic duct was successful in all cases. Cumulative times (mean ± standard deviation) in the IL and PL groups from start of the procedure until (i) initial lymphangiogram were 20.5 minutes ± 8.6 and 46.5 minutes ± 22.6, (ii) identification of a target lymphatic for catheterization were 60.5 minutes ± 18.2 and 110.5 minutes ± 31.6, (iii) catheterization of the thoracic duct were 79.0 minutes ± 28.9 and 128.2 minutes ± 37.0, and (iv) completion of procedure were 125.8 minutes ± 49.0 and 152.8 minutes ± 36.4.

Conclusions: IL is a feasible technique to visualize the thoracic duct for embolization. Using IL, the thoracic duct may be more quickly visualized and catheterized for TDE than with PL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources