Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012;84(3):193-9.
doi: 10.1159/000336549. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

Health status assessment in routine clinical practice: the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score in outpatients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Health status assessment in routine clinical practice: the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score in outpatients

Julia L Kelly et al. Respiration. 2012.

Abstract

Background: The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) is a simple, self-completion questionnaire developed to measure health status in patients with COPD, which is potentially suitable for routine clinical use.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to establish the determinants of the CAT score in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Patients attending the clinic completed the CAT score before being seen. Clinical data, including, where available, plethysmographic lung volumes, transfer factor and arterial blood gas analysis, were recorded on a pro forma in the clinic.

Results: In 224 patients (36% female), mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) was 40.1% (17.9) of predicted (%pred); CAT score was associated with exacerbation frequency [0-1/year 20.1 (7.6); 2-4/year 23.5 (7.8); >4/year 28.5 (7.3), p < 0.0001; 41/40/19% in each category] and with Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea score (r² = 0.26, p < 0.0001) rising approximately 4 points with each grade. FEV(1) %pred had only a weak influence. Using stepwise regression, CAT score = 2.48 + 4.12 [MRC (1-5) dyspnoea score] + 0.08 (FEV(1) %pred) + 1.06 (exacerbation rate/year)] (r² = 0.36, p < 0.0001). The CAT score was higher in patients (n = 54) with daily sputum production [25.9 (7.5) vs. 22.2 (8.2); p = 0.004]. Detailed lung function (plethysmography and gas transfer) was available in 151 patients but had little influence on the CAT score.

Conclusion: The CAT score is associated with clinically important variables in patients with COPD and enables health status measurement to be performed in routine clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • It's time to let the 'CAT' out...patient!
    Scichilone N, Chetta A. Scichilone N, et al. Respiration. 2012;84(3):189-90. doi: 10.1159/000337272. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Respiration. 2012. PMID: 22441166 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types