Is an odds ratio of 3 too high a threshold for true associations in clinical epidemiology?
- PMID: 22445083
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.02.009
Is an odds ratio of 3 too high a threshold for true associations in clinical epidemiology?
Similar articles
-
Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;22(5):354-8. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1469797
-
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.Stat Med. 2007 Jul 20;26(16):3078-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.2781. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 17187347
-
Lethal misconceptions: interpretation and bias in studies of traffic deaths.J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 May;65(5):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Dec 31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22212528 Review.
-
Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies.Genet Epidemiol. 2007 May;31(4):288-95. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20209. Genet Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17266119
-
[Correlation measures in epidemiology].Med Trop (Mars). 2003;63(1):75-8. Med Trop (Mars). 2003. PMID: 12891755 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Trimming tiers - Motivations and means for de-risking select agents.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jun 27;13:1630609. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1630609. eCollection 2025. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025. PMID: 40657161 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources