Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study
- PMID: 22448110
- PMCID: PMC3310352
- DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s29761
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study
Abstract
Objective: To compare the operative outcomes, postoperative pain, and subsequent convalescence after laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) or conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation.
Study design: From December 2009 to September 2010, 63 patients underwent LESS (n = 33) or a conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 30) for cyst enucleation. The overall operative outcomes including postoperative pain measurement using the visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated (time points 6, 24, and 24 hours). The convalescence data included data obtained from questionnaires on the need for analgesics and on patient-reported time to recovery end points.
Results: The preoperative characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The postoperative hemoglobin drop was higher in the LESS group than in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (P = 0.048). Postoperative pain at each VAS time point, oral analgesic requirement, intramuscular analgesic requirement, and the number of days until return to work were similar in both groups.
Conclusion: In adnexa-preserving surgery performed in reproductive-age women, the operative outcomes, including satisfaction of the patients and convalescence after surgery, are comparable for LESS and conventional laparoscopy. LESS may be a feasible and a promising alternative method for scarless abdominal surgery in the treatment of young women with adnexal cysts.
Keywords: adnexal preservation; cyst; laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; laparoscopic surgery; scar.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e032331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032331. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32066600 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4):358.e1-358.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.048. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31589864 Clinical Trial.
-
Management of pediatric and adolescent adnexal masses by gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014. PMID: 25129151
-
Suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic nephrectomy: A propensity score-based analysis.Int J Urol. 2021 Feb;28(2):196-201. doi: 10.1111/iju.14429. Epub 2020 Nov 23. Int J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33230942
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy versus conventional laparoendoscopic nephrectomy for kidney tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biosci Rep. 2019 Aug 9;39(8):BSR20190014. doi: 10.1042/BSR20190014. Print 2019 Aug 30. Biosci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31358687 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of conventional versus single port laparoscopy for surgical treatment of gynecological diseases: a pilot study.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):252-260. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105823. Epub 2021 May 5. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022. PMID: 35251414 Free PMC article.
-
Conventional laparoscopy vs. single port surgery from a patient's point of view: influence of demographics and body mass index.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 Dec;124(23-24):834-41. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0299-6. Epub 2012 Nov 20. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012. PMID: 23179437
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e032331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032331. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32066600 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy Compared to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;49(4):1153-1163. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.463. Epub 2017 Feb 27. Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28253566 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of two different laparoscopic techniques on post-operative wound complications in patients with benign gynaecological diseases: A meta-analysis.Int Wound J. 2023 Oct 13;21(2):e14382. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14382. Online ahead of print. Int Wound J. 2023. Retraction in: Int Wound J. 2025 Mar;22(3):e70347. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70347. PMID: 37830298 Free PMC article. Retracted.
References
-
- Jeon HG, Jeong W, Oh CK, et al. Initial experience with 50 laparoendoscopic single site surgeries using a homemade, single port device at a single center. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1866–1871. - PubMed
-
- Kim TJ. Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery. Korean J Gynecol Endosc Minim Invasive Surg. 2009;21(1):27–30. Korean.
-
- Yoon BS, Park H, Seong SJ, Park CT, Park SW, Lee KJ. Single-port laparoscopic salpingectomy for the surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(1):26–29. - PubMed
-
- Lim MC, Kim TJ, Kang S, Bae DS, Park SY, Seo SS. Embryonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for adnexal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2445–2449. - PubMed
-
- Kim TJ, Lee YY, Kim MJ, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(5):612–615. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources