Neuroscience, ethics, and national security: the state of the art
- PMID: 22448146
- PMCID: PMC3308927
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001289
Neuroscience, ethics, and national security: the state of the art
Abstract
National security organizations in the United States, including the armed services and the intelligence community, have developed a close relationship with the scientific establishment. The latest technology often fuels warfighting and counter-intelligence capacities, providing the tactical advantages thought necessary to maintain geopolitical dominance and national security. Neuroscience has emerged as a prominent focus within this milieu, annually receiving hundreds of millions of Department of Defense dollars. Its role in national security operations raises ethical issues that need to be addressed to ensure the pragmatic synthesis of ethical accountability and national security.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Bioethics and the national security state.J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):198-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00466.x. J Law Med Ethics. 2004. PMID: 15301184
-
Mind wars. Brain science and the military.Monash Bioeth Rev. 2013 Sep;31(2):83-99. doi: 10.1007/BF03351549. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2013. PMID: 24844082
-
Military medical ethics: a review of the literature and a call to arms.Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2013 Jan;22(1):92-109. doi: 10.1017/S0963180112000424. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23206362 Review. No abstract available.
-
From Healthcare to Warfare and Reverse: How Should We Regulate Dual-Use Neurotechnology?Neuron. 2018 Jan 17;97(2):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.017. Neuron. 2018. PMID: 29346750 Review.
-
Violating ethics: unlawful combatants, national security and health professionals.J Med Ethics. 2007 Mar;33(3):143-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.016550. J Med Ethics. 2007. PMID: 17329383 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The social life of the brain: Neuroscience in society.Curr Sociol. 2013 May;61(3):322-340. doi: 10.1177/0011392113476464. Curr Sociol. 2013. PMID: 24285875 Free PMC article.
-
The present and future of neural interfaces.Front Neurorobot. 2022 Oct 11;16:953968. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.953968. eCollection 2022. Front Neurorobot. 2022. PMID: 36304780 Free PMC article.
-
Why non-invasive brain stimulation should not be used in military and security services.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 9;7:553. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00553. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24058339 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):365-386. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Neuroethics. 2021. PMID: 33942016 Free PMC article.
-
Wired Emotions: Ethical Issues of Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):351-367. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00087-2. Epub 2019 Mar 13. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020. PMID: 30868377 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Committee on Military and Intelligence Methodology for Emergent Neurophysiological and Cognitive/Neural Research in the Next Two Decades, National Research Council of the National Academies. Emerging cognitive neuroscience and related technologies. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press; 2008. 214
-
- Committee on Opportunities in Neuroscience for Future Army Applications, National Research Council of the National Academies. Opportunities in neuroscience for future army applications. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press; 2009. 136
-
- Kosal M. E, Huang J. Y. Security implications of cognitive neuroscience research: Results from an ethnographic survey of researchers. Brain Waves Module 3: Neuroscience, conflict and security. London: The Royal Society; 2011.
-
- Lebedev M. A, Nicolelis M. A. L. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29(9):536–546. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources